Why Have Chinese Stocks Held Up So Well?

01 June 2020
2 min read
John Lin| Chief Investment Officer—China Equities
Stuart Rae| Chief Investment Officer—Emerging Markets Value Equities
Chinese Equities Benefited from Early Recovery, Stimulus Potential
Chinese Equities Benefited from Early Recovery, Stimulus Potential

Historical analysis does not guarantee future results.
1 All indices are net total returns in USD.
2 Earnings revisions are 12-month forward consensus earnings revisions as of May 5, 2020.
3 Autos show recovery in number of passenger vehicles sold in April 2020 vs. March 2020. Smartphones show recovery of total shipments in April 2020 vs. March 2020. Restaurants show average April 2020 revenue as a percentage of pre-pandemic level based on reports from four major companies: Haidilao, Taier, Xiabu Xiabu and Yum China.
4 Country stimulus packages shown are as of March 31, 2020.
Source: Bank of England, Banks of Japan, Bloomberg, Bureau of Economic Analysis, China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, CAICT, CLSA, CNBC, Us Department of Commerce, European Central Bank, Refinitiv, Haidilao, China Ministry of Finance, Morgan Stanley, MSCI, People’s Bank of China, Thomson Reuters, RIMES Technologies, Tai’Er, Xiabu Xiabu, Yum China and AllianceBernstein (AB)

China’s stock markets have been remarkably resilient. As the world’s second-largest economy emerged first from the virus-induced shock, corporate earnings downgrades were relatively contained while government stimulus was preserved for future use.

By May 31, the MSCI China Index, including onshore and offshore Chinese stocks, had fallen 5.0% since the beginning of the year in US dollar terms (Display, left, upper bars). The MSCI China A Onshore Index was down by 4.8% over the same period. Chinese stocks have done relatively well in the difficult environment for three reasons.

  1. First Out, First Back

    Since China was hit by the virus first, its economy has also recovered earlier. Of course, there’s a real risk of another wave of infections. Still, the earlier exit from the lockdown means businesses are getting back online and the economy is starting to rev up.

  2. Industry Recoveries Curb Earnings Hit

    Key industries are recovering sharply. Auto and smartphone sales have rebounded, while restaurants are filling tables again. To be sure, some sectors are still struggling, such as travel and leisure. However, as a whole, Chinese corporate fundamentals haven’t been hit as hard as other countries. As a result, earnings revisions in China have been relatively modest (Display, left, lower bars).

  3. More Stimulus Potential

    Chinese policymakers have introduced measures to support the hardest-hit parts of the economy. Yet the level of fiscal and monetary stimulus versus GDP is much lower in China than elsewhere (Display, right).


Policymakers, like investors, still vividly remember the hangover from the debt-financed stimulus in 2009–2010. And China’s domestic economy is much different than developed economies because employment-sensitive consumption and services sectors make up a smaller portion of the economy compared to the West. So the lockdown, which hit those sectors disproportionally, also had a milder impact on employment in China, meaning less government support was needed. However, now that overseas orders for Chinese factories are drying up, we expect policy stimulus measures to ramp up, and the Chinese government has plenty of firepower to do just that.

Before the new coronavirus hit, Chinese equity valuations were lower than major global peers amid concern about the ongoing US trade war and the pace of macroeconomic growth. Lower valuations may have also helped reduce the damage when the virus hit. Today, domestic Chinese shares trade at a price/earnings ratio of about 11.7×, based on 12-month forward earnings estimates. This is still lower than that of US and European stocks, which trade at 18.9× and 14.5× respectively, as of May 31. While near-term earnings visibility is still very cloudy, the direction is probably clearer than in other parts of the world. As a result, we believe investors who identify Chinese companies with solid businesses can find attractive positions for the next stage of the recovery.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.

MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations, and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein.


About the Authors

John Lin is the Chief Investment Officer of China Equities. He has been a Portfolio Manager for AB China Equities since 2013 and for Emerging Markets Value Equities since 2021. From 2008 to 2022, Lin served as a senior research analyst, responsible for covering financials, real estate and conglomerate companies in Hong Kong and China. He joined the firm in New York in 2006 as a research associate, covering consumer services companies for US Small & Mid-Cap Value Equities. Previously, Lin was a technology, media and telecom investment banker at Citigroup. He holds a BS (magna cum laude) in environmental engineering from Cornell University, and an MBA from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, where he earned the distinction Graduation with Honors. Location: Singapore

Stuart Rae is Chief Investment Officer of Emerging Markets Value Equities since 2023 and Chief Investment Officer of Asia-Pacific Value Equities, a position he has held since 2006. He is also a long-standing Portfolio Manager for China Equities. Previously, Rae was CIO of Australian Value Equities from 2003 to 2006. He joined the firm in 1999 as a research analyst covering the consumer sector, initially working in New York and London before moving to Sydney in 2003, Hong Kong in 2006 and Melbourne in 2021. Before that, Rae was a management consultant with McKinsey for six years in Australia and the UK. He holds a BSc (Hons) in physics from Monash University, Australia, and a DPhil in physics from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. Location: Melbourne