US Commercial Real Estate Outlook

Seeking Calmer Waters in Quality

28 April 2023

6 min read

Marshall L. Glick| Senior Analyst—Securitized Asset Management

Eric Goldstein, CFA| Research Analyst—Commercial Real Estate Credit Research

Monika Carlson| Managing Director, Senior Investment Strategist and Head—Income and Systematic Fixed Income Business Development

The COVID-19 pandemic upended the way we live and work by creating secular changes and accelerating trends that were already afoot. For investors in commercial real estate, the results have been mixed.

The pandemic hurt small retailers by hastening the transition to digital commerce and emptied office buildings by turning living rooms into workspace. But it also fueled a warehouse building boom and unleashed a torrent of pent-up travel-and-leisure spending when economies reopened, underscoring the diversity of commercial real estate.

Recent turmoil in the banking industry has renewed concerns that the crosswinds buffeting commercial real estate could turn into headwinds. Of particular concern are midsized and regional banks, which purchase commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and are active commercial real estate lenders. A pullback in lending by regional banks could create a credit crunch that would have a negative impact on real estate valuations.

There’s no doubting the many challenges facing commercial real estate, but we believe the issues afflicting banks are largely idiosyncratic, rather than systemic. Moreover, the commercial mortgage market is too diverse to be painted with the same brush—fundamentals vary widely by property type, location and quality. For investors, conducting thoughtful due diligence and picking the right spots has never been more important.

With Credit Tightening, Quality Matters

Mortgage-backed securities are an important component of commercial real estate lending, comprising more than 13% of commercial and multifamily mortgage debt outstanding. CMBS are made up of mortgages that finance the purchase of hotels, office buildings, apartment buildings and other commercial property.

To create CMBS, individual mortgage loans are pooled and securitized into rated securities and then divided into tranches according to credit quality. At the high end are securities rated AAA with relatively low credit risk. These upper tranches often feature credit enhancements that cushion investors from potential losses, while saddling investors farther down the credit spectrum with the lion’s share of credit risk in exchange for higher yields (Display).

Higher-Rated CMBS Tranches Often Have Stronger Credit Enhancements

New-Issue Credit Enhancements vs. AB-Modeled Loss Scenarios (Percent)

Bar chart showing newer vintage CMBS with more exposure to office properties.

Historical analysis does not guarantee future results.
Baseline scenario includes an immediate recession for two years followed by stabilization and a recovery, with a 38% default rate in offices (by market value) and a 5% reduction in office rents. Office Stress includes the Base case assumptions plus a more punitive outcome for office properties with 68% of office loans defaulting and a 10% reduction in rent. The rent assumptions include specific reductions in more stressed commercial business districts. As of March 31, 2023
Source: Bloomberg, Real Capital Analytics, Trepp and AB

A second kind of CMBS is created from a single loan, collateralized by a single property or cross-collateralized by multiple properties in a single-asset single-borrower (SASB) deal—its risk is similarly divided into rated traches.

In the current environment, we believe investors should focus on higher-quality tranches to protect against downside scenarios, although we also see select opportunities to purchase lower-rated securities with favorable risk/return profiles.

Here, some historical context is in order: Even during the worst of the global financial crisis, which saw a crisis of confidence in mortgage-backed securities, AAA-rated CMBS with at least 20% credit enhancements didn’t take losses, and the credit enhancements have increased since then.

Know Your Vintage: Newer Isn’t Always Better

It’s also important for investors to consider when the securities were issued. More seasoned CMBS vintages—particularly those issued between 2014–2018—have benefited from property price appreciation and higher current credit enhancements.

By contrast, the loans underlying newer-vintage bonds have more exposure to struggling office properties (Display). They’re also more difficult to refinance and have seen little to no price appreciation in underlying properties. For these reasons, it’s important for investors in newer-dated CMBS to stick with the highest-quality tranches.

Newer Vintages Have More Exposure to Offices

CMBS Exposure by Vintage (Percent)

Bar chart showing credit enhancements for CMBS tranches, from 7% on BBB- to 30% for AAA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.
As of March 31, 2023
Source: Bloomberg and AllianceBernstein (AB)

Assessing Different Property Types

Although it’s tempting to lump commercial real estate together, the commercial real estate market is complex, and some property types are better positioned than others.

Office: The office segment remains our highest concern as the demand for office space has fallen, particularly within the technology sector. Although recent-vintage CMBS have more exposure to offices, this risk is partially mitigated by longer-term leases, which provide more leeway to re-tenant space. This sets the stage for what we believe will be a gradual increase in delinquencies as tenant re-leasing needs change once leases expire. Older-vintage CMBS, on the other hand, have benefited from deleveraging and less exposure to offices.
Retail, Regional Malls: Malls with lower sales per square foot—particularly those in tertiary markets—remain a concern. Many owners are reluctant to invest in property improvements unless they see a commensurate return on their capital. Given credit constraints, we are wary of legacy CMBS loans backed by lower-quality malls and anticipate further loan extensions and some defaults. By contrast, better-quality properties—particularly those in growing markets that have been creative in catering to evolving consumer tastes—have the potential to thrive.
Retail, Non-malls: Non-mall retail has proven to be surprisingly resilient, benefiting from strong consumer spending and nondiscretionary outlays. Many retailers have also been able to refinance their brick-and-mortar assets to keep financing costs in check.
Lodging: Corporate cost cutting and reduced business travel have put the squeeze on full-service hotels that cater primarily to business travelers. Limited-service hotels, on the other hand, have benefited from increased domestic and leisure travel. Limited-service hotels also have lower break-even costs, which provide additional financial cushion.
Multi-family: A housing supply shortage, high single-family home prices and relatively high mortgage rates have been catalysts for multi-family housing. Increased labor, material and financing costs could slow construction in the coming years, which further supports solid demand for existing housing stock. As a result, we expect slow but steady growth in rents to support loan performance.
Industrial: Warehouses and data centers have been among the biggest winners thanks to the growth of online retailing and cloud computing. Although rents have risen steadily, we expect growth in this segment to slow if the economy weakens and larger tenants pull back on new leases.

Choppiness Likely, but High-Quality Credits Should Fare Better

We expect commercial real estate to face continued challenges as cap rates (a function of net operating income and property values) rise and interest rates stay elevated. As a result, we expect to see a gradual uptick in delinquencies over the course of the year. However, we expect most credit impairments will be contained to lower-rated CMBS tranches and more troubled segments like office buildings.

For the CMBS market to function smoothly, lending activity must remain robust. Although we anticipate a more restrictive lending environment, we expect lenders to work closely with high-quality borrowers to extend loans and avoid foreclosure. Look for institutional CMBS conduit and SASB borrowers to extract the most favorable terms from lenders.

The Federal Reserve may also consider changes that would allow banks to avoid reclassifying loans or taking reserves against potential losses if there’s a reasonable expectation of full recovery. Similar measures were successfully employed during the global financial crisis.

Investors may also benefit from positive technical factors resulting from low CMBS issuance. Reduced supply should prevent a widening in spreads, providing some measure of price support. In time, renewed confidence in mid-sized and regional banks should support the CMBS market and provide a more normalized operating market. Until then, investors should expect elevated volatility—particularly in the office segment—making the focus on credit quality all the more important.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations, and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams and are subject to change over time.

About the Authors

Marshall L. Glick

Marshall Glick is a Senior Vice President and Senior Analyst in AB’s Securitized Asset Management Group, where he oversees investments in commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBSs). He first worked at the firm from 1996 to 2002. From 2002 to 2009, Glick was a senior credit officer at Fortress Investment Group, where he sourced, underwrote and managed the assets in a multibillion-dollar investment portfolio that included credit-sensitive CMBSs, B-notes, mezzanine debt and whole loans, along with REIT debt and leveraged bank loans. He previously served as vice president, Structured Products, at AB, where he focused on primary and secondary offerings of CMBSs and covered the REIT debt sector. Prior to joining AB, he was associate director in the Structured Finance Ratings division at Standard & Poor’s Rating Services. Glick holds a BS in finance from the State University of New York, Albany, and an MBA from Fordham University. Location: New York

Eric Goldstein, CFA

Eric Goldstein is a Senior Vice President and Research Analyst for Commercial Real Estate Credit Research on the Securitized Assets Research team. He joined his current team as a desk analyst in June 2015, concentrating on commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and liaising among Research, Trading and Portfolio Management. In 2013, Goldstein joined the Global Credit team as an associate portfolio manager, after having served in the same role since 2008 on the US Multi-Sector team. He joined AB in 2007 as a Fixed Income rotational program associate on the Securitized Products Research team, where he covered asset-backed securities and CMBS, in addition to serving as a portfolio assistant on the Insurance team. Goldstein holds a BS in finance and marketing from New York University and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York

Monika Carlson

Monika Carlson is a Managing Director, Senior Investment Strategist, and Head of the Income and Systematic platforms for the Fixed Income Business Development team. She is responsible for leading a team of investment strategists and product managers and for driving growth efforts on AB’s fixed-income platform. Additionally, as part of her client-facing role, Carlson represents AB’s market views and portfolio strategies to clients, prospects and consultants globally. She has held several roles at AB, including as the head of the Global Offshore Retail Platform in Product Management. Prior to joining AB in 2007, Carlson worked at Neuberger Berman. She holds a BBA in finance from Baruch College at the City University of New York and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York

This information is for exclusive use of the wholesale person to whom it is provided and is not to be relied upon by any other person. It is not intended for retail or public use and may not be further distributed without prior written consent of ABAL.
This webpage has been prepared by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (“ABAL”)—ABN 53 095 022 718, AFSL 230 698. Information in this webpage is only intended for persons that qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined by the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013’, and is not to be construed as advice. This webpage is provided solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell securities. The information, forecasts and opinions set forth in this webpage have not been prepared for any recipient’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Neither this webpage nor the information contained in it are intended to take the place of professional advice.
You should not take action on specific issues based on the information contained in this webpage without first obtaining professional advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Projections, although based on current information, may not be realized. Information, forecasts and opinions can change without notice and ABAL does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time. Although care has been exercised in compiling the information contained in this webpage, ABAL does not warrant that this webpage is free from errors, inaccuracies or omissions. ABAL disclaims any liability for damage or loss arising from reliance upon any matter contained in this webpage except for statutory liability which cannot be excluded.
No reproduction of the materials on this webpage may be made without the express written permission of ABAL. This information is provided for persons in Australia only and is not being provided for the use of any person who is in any other country.