Time Is Money

Restoring Investor Confidence in Long-Term Cash Flows

17 August 2021

5 min read

Chris Kotowicz, CFA| Portfolio Manager and Senior Research Analyst—US Relative Value; Senior Research Analyst—US Growth Equities

Vincent Dupont, CFA| Director of Research—US Growth Equities

As equity style winds shift, investors are still debating the merits of growth versus value stocks. But we believe quality remains the essential focal point, especially amid a low interest-rate environment that has changed the math behind company valuations.

It’s been 40 years since a Volcker-led Federal Reserve pushed interest rates to record highs to fight an era of soaring and economically stifling inflation. Since then, however, rates have steadily fallen. Today, largely led by central bank policies, interest rates have flatlined at historical lows. Investors have had almost no influence over this trend, but it has had a major impact on the prices of financial assets.

Gauging Current Value Using Tomorrow’s Cash Generation

When investors use discounted cash-flow analysis (DCF) to value a company’s cash-flow streams, lower rates increase the calculated net present value of its assets.

As the saying goes, “time is money.” The further out investors look, the harder it gets to gain confidence in either the quantum or timing of an asset’s cash flows. And that’s only if there are any; Bitcoin, for instance, offers no cash-flow streams.

So, the “discount” component of DCF analysis is a discount rate to reflect the fact that money received in the future is worth less than money in hand today. Discount rates are not uniform across assets. They attempt to account not only for time but also for varying degrees of risk associated with their very different cash-flow streams.

Investors Are Assuming More Risk for Less Reward

The historically low “risk-free” rate environment—primarily represented by US Treasury yields—is further compounded by higher current investor risk tolerance, which arguably is why valuations are running so hot. But this means risk spreads are also lower than normal at a time when investor risk tolerance is greater than ever as they stretch for income. In fact, average spreads between high-yield bonds and the risk-free 10-Year US Treasury have narrowed to 2.9%, nearly a 20-year low (Display).

Low Rates and Greater Appetite for Risk Have Narrowed 10-Year Spreads to 20-Year Lows

At 2.9%, the spread between bonds and the risk-free 10-Year Treasury suggest investors are getting paid little for the risks they’re taking.

Through August 11, 2021
Source: FactSet, ICE BofA US High Yield Index Effective Yield and AllianceBernstein (AB)

That being said, investors are getting paid way less to take a given amount of risk than in the past, independent of the underlying risk-free rate. While many investors used to think about a 10% or higher weighted average cost of capital to assess long-term asset values, today many assets appear to be discounted using rates of just 5%, or lower.

To some extent, investors’ seemingly higher risk tolerance might simply be an illusion. Many investors, and especially passive investors, are far removed from the assessment of a company’s value. For example, participants in US 401(k) retirement plans are a huge part of the equity market investor crowd. But they’re likely to have limited connectivity to the valuation of (or put differently, the yield on) the assets they are acquiring with each contribution or account rebalance.

DCF Presents High Stakes in a Low-Rate Environment

Future cash flows have never been worth more than they are today. But all companies, or assets, haven’t benefited equally. Due to the power of compounding, companies that generate more of their lifetime earnings or cash flows further out in the future get a bigger benefit than companies generating more of their cash flows sooner. Cash flows of higher-growth companies, for example, are typically generated much further in the future than those of lower-growth companies. That’s why an increase in the discount rate used to calculate the present value of cash flows disproportionately lowers the fair value of higher-growth stocks more than low-growth stocks, and this spread widens as rates rise (Display left).

How Rising Discount Rates Affect Valuations of Different Types of Companies

Fair market value drops more for higher-growth stocks as discount rates rise, and price/sales ratios for auto components is more compelling than software the further ahead you look.

As of July 30, 2021
*Illustrative example. The lower-growth company generates $94 in free cash flow in year 1 and that grows 3% annually thereafter, while the higher-growth company generates $12.50 in free cash flow in year 1, growing 20% thereafter.
†Based on industry components of S&P 1500 Composite Index.
Source: S&P 1500 Composite Index and AllianceBernstein (AB)

Such divergence is also seen across whole industries or subsectors. For instance, the price-to-sales ratio—a company’s market capitalization divided by its sales—has risen sharply for software companies as discount rates have fallen. By contrast, it hardly changed, or “rerated,” for the auto components sector (Display right). This shows the relative discount rate applied to software has fallen more than it has for auto components, but if rates rise, we believe that benefit will begin to reverse.

This especially applies to early-stage growth companies, where there is less (if any) free cash flow available to shareholders in the short to medium term. Such companies offer characteristics that are similar to bonds with longer durations (i.e., maturing in 10 years or more), as their weighted cash flows are received further out than companies that are more profitable today. These companies, and long-duration assets in general, have benefited from many years of falling rates compared to more mature companies. Importantly, the relative benefits have increased as rates have fallen. Mathematically, when rates drop from 5% to 4%, the benefits to long-duration assets are greater than those if rates fall from 10% to 9%.

Rates Set the Tone, But Quality Should Guide Selection

We live and invest in a seemingly more disruptive, competitive environment than ever, while inflation pressures are also accelerating. This can be seen very clearly in places like the US housing market and across durable goods. Combined with long-term risk-free interest rates that sit today near 1%, and tight risk spreads, it’s unlikely that discount rates will fall much further. For high-growth stocks with limited current profitability, the elimination of the rate-driven tailwind arguably looks like a relative headwind.

If rates increase just moderately, both high-quality and value stocks with less reliance on cash flow generated well in the future stand to benefit on a relative basis. Ironically, rising interest rates might have very little impact on a company that is already pricing in a finite lifespan, such as an upstream oil and gas producer.

Consistent Profitability Matters

Nobody knows where interest rates will head. But as economies further cycle from recovery to expansion, it’s especially important to lean in to consistent, highly profitable business models. There is evidence that highly profitable companies, as measured by return on assets (ROA), tend to stay that way for multiple years, while less-profitable ones are more likely to falter.

We believe that profitability-based metrics, such as ROA or return on invested capital, will be especially telling of quality business models if interest rates rise (thereby increasing the cost of capital and the discount rates used to value future cash flows).

As economies continue to improve and lift markets to higher valuations, investors will need to focus on companies with resilient business models that can deliver solid returns in the post-pandemic world. And when quality is at the heart of fundamental analysis, investors can create portfolios with the potential to deliver more consistent performance across changing economic cycles.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams and are subject to revision over time.

About the Authors

Chris Kotowicz, CFA

Chris Kotowicz joined the firm in 2007 and is a Portfolio Manager and Senior Research Analyst for US Relative Value. He is also a Senior Research Analyst for the US Growth Equities team. As a Senior Research Analyst, Kotowicz is responsible for lead coverage of the industrials, energy and materials sectors. He was previously a sell-side analyst at A.G. Edwards, where he followed the electrical equipment and multi-industry group for four years. Prior to that, Kotowicz worked in the industrial sector, mostly in a technical sales and business development capacity, for Nooter/Eriksen and Nooter Fabricators, each a subsidiary of CIC Group. He holds a BS in civil engineering from the University of Missouri, Columbia, and an MBA (with honors) from the Olin Business School at Washington University. He is a CFA charterholder. Location: Chicago

Vincent Dupont, CFA

Vincent Dupont is a Senior Vice President and Director of Research for US Growth Equities. Before joining the US Growth team in 2009 as a portfolio manager, he spent 10 years as a fundamental research analyst covering semiconductors and semiconductor capital equipment. Prior to joining the firm in 1999, Dupont researched the Russian economy at the Council on Foreign Relations for a year and worked at the US State Department as an arms control official for six years. He holds a BA in political science from Northwestern University and a PhD in international affairs/Russian studies from Columbia University, and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York

This information is for exclusive use of the wholesale person to whom it is provided and is not to be relied upon by any other person. It is not intended for retail or public use and may not be further distributed without prior written consent of ABAL.
This webpage has been prepared by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (“ABAL”)—ABN 53 095 022 718, AFSL 230 698. Information in this webpage is only intended for persons that qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined by the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013’, and is not to be construed as advice. This webpage is provided solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell securities. The information, forecasts and opinions set forth in this webpage have not been prepared for any recipient’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Neither this webpage nor the information contained in it are intended to take the place of professional advice.
You should not take action on specific issues based on the information contained in this webpage without first obtaining professional advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Projections, although based on current information, may not be realized. Information, forecasts and opinions can change without notice and ABAL does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time. Although care has been exercised in compiling the information contained in this webpage, ABAL does not warrant that this webpage is free from errors, inaccuracies or omissions. ABAL disclaims any liability for damage or loss arising from reliance upon any matter contained in this webpage except for statutory liability which cannot be excluded.
No reproduction of the materials on this webpage may be made without the express written permission of ABAL. This information is provided for persons in Australia only and is not being provided for the use of any person who is in any other country.