Security Concerns Add Urgency to Global Energy Transition

17 June 2022

7 min read

David Wheeler, CFA| Portfolio Manager—Sustainable Climate Solutions; Senior Research Analyst—Sustainable Thematic Equities

Jeremy Taylor| Senior Research Analyst and Portfolio Manager—Value Equities

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has caused enormous human suffering and upended the previous political consensus in Europe. It’s also prompted concerns that Western countries will be distracted from environmental priorities as they struggle to replace embargoed Russian oil and gas. But data suggest otherwise—that the global energy transition is accelerating and that the widespread effects from the conflict bolster the secular growth case for renewable energy.

Investment in Renewables Is Set to Soar

According to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA’s) “Net Zero by 2050” roadmap, the world already had enough operational oil and gas fields and coal mines before the invasion to meet anticipated demand in their pathway to 2050. But increases in renewable energy generation and energy efficiency were behind target, despite impressive growth rates. As the IEA put it, “The path to net-zero emission is narrow: staying on it requires immediate and massive deployment of all available clean and efficient energy technologies” (Display).

What Is Needed to Achieve Net Zero?

Increased Spending Across a Spectrum of Decarbonization Solutions

The IEA net zero scenario shows rising spend across a spectrum of solutions: low-emission fuels, electricity generation, infrastructure and end-use.

Historical and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
As of September 30, 2021
Source: IEA

Now, as the world faces higher hydrocarbon prices and as Western Europe is confronted by an absolute shortage of gas, the pressure is growing to economize on consumption, phase out Russian oil and gas, and substitute renewables. We expect investment in clean energy to surge in response to the existential threat of attack and the need for energy security.

Meanwhile, as renewable output ramps up, the Western world must still find ways to avoid an imminent energy deficit from reduced Russian oil and gas supplies. Addressing this problem will temporarily expand oil and gas exploration and production, but we don’t believe it will reduce the long-term pace of the transition away from hydrocarbons.

Higher Prices for Oil, Gas, Power and Carbon Make Renewables More Attractive

For Western countries, the invasion of Ukraine can only strengthen the case for much higher production of renewable energy as part of a more secure, sustainable energy infrastructure. Effectively, the Ukraine crisis adds urgency to the global energy transition by highlighting the increased need for energy security.

Until recently, hydrocarbons were cheap by historical standards and renewables were just becoming fully cost-competitive. Power prices in Europe (and the US), stable for several years, recently soared as natural gas prices rose and the supply/demand balance tightened (Display, right).

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has profoundly changed the outlook. On top of energy security considerations, the economics of renewables have improved versus fossil fuels—driven by higher oil, natural-gas and electricity prices. Higher and more volatile energy prices make renewables relatively more attractive and new technologies like electric vehicles (EVs) relatively more affordable. The price of carbon has also risen—another factor making clean energy more attractive (Display, left).

Power and Emissions Prices Have Surged

Higher Prices Make Low-Carbon Solutions More Competitive

In 2021 and 2022 the price of EU carbon emissions futures and baseload power in France, the UK and Germany has risen exponentially.

Historical and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
*Year to date
As of May 13, 2022
Source: Bloomberg and BloombergNEF

Renewables Are Now Price-Competitive…

The IEA and others now believe that wind and solar power are price competitive with, or cheaper than, fossil-fuel power in two-thirds of the world’s countries. As a result, direct subsidies for renewables have now largely been phased out.

Prices for renewable-generating assets in the secondary market are rising sharply, demonstrating that renewable generation is now fully cost-effective and attractive to investors—who are currently paying between 1.5 and two times as much for existing clean-energy assets as they were two years ago.

Another way to quantify the robust appetite for renewable energy is through movements in the prices of power purchase agreements (PPAs), long-term agreements for the purchase of energy between renewable developers and consumers. These prices have risen materially since the first half of 2020 across Europe.

Because PPAs feature an agreed-on price over a long period, they can be particularly attractive when hydrocarbon prices are volatile. Buying renewable energy is also a reputational positive for energy-intensive consumer businesses such as airlines, enabling them to demonstrate cleaner supply chains.

…with Attractive Investment Characteristics

As a result of these developments, we believe investments in clean energy projects offer visible long-term growth potential with defensive return characteristics.

Over a medium-term five- to 10-year horizon, clean energy represents a strong secular growth story. The energy transition program will be the primary growth driver, and is now accompanied by the greater need for energy security. Two other developments may also spur growth in renewables. First, energy demand typically expands with economic growth, and it would take major advances in energy efficiency for that relationship to be broken. Second, stubbornly high hydrocarbon prices would also speed the adoption of clean energy sources.

Together these factors should make clean energy one of the foremost defensive growth sectors in the foreseeable future. Clean energy, as is the case with oil and gas, has the added attraction of offering a potential hedge against inflation. We also believe that companies whose products and services help conserve energy and reduce net carbon emissions may be similarly attractive.

Investment in the Energy Transition Has Already Accelerated

Last year, global spending on the energy transition was up 30%. That’s after posting 19% growth in 2020, and 10% compound average growth from 2014 to 2019, according to BloombergNEF statistics (Display).

Energy Transition Investment Has Accelerated

Global Investment Has Grown Across Multiple Sectors (USD billions)

From 2004 through 2021 the pace of investment globally has steadily increased, from US$ 32 billion to US$784 billion.

Historical and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
CCS = Carbon Capture and Storage
As of May 31, 2022Source: BloombergNEF

Consumers are adapting fast, too. For example, in a weak market for vehicle sales generally, global EV sales have kept rising strongly in 2022, with two million vehicles sold in the first quarter—that’s up 75% from the same period in 2021 (according to the Global EV Outlook).

Further Growth in Renewable Capacity Faces Bottlenecks

European and other governments have acted promptly to bring forward their decarbonization targets and to announce new renewable projects and energy conservation measures, with the European Union’s (EU’s) REPowerEU plan a notable example. However, these ambitious programs face practical obstacles.

In theory, it should be possible to expand capacity in solar and onshore wind power, and to create a bigger role for hydrogen, relatively quickly. In practice, though, labor, supply-chain and planning issues all create bottlenecks. And to be truly clean, hydrogen must be generated from renewable sources. It may not be until the 2030s that the world has enough excess clean energy to make hydrogen a substantial contributor to the share of renewables. And while European and other governments may favor relaxing planning controls, they will likely face stiff opposition.

Costs are a further constraint, given the rising prices of metals and components. So the energy transition will be a complex journey.

Oil and Gas Still Have a Place in the Energy Mix

Replacing Russian energy will be an enormous project. Considering the practical obstacles, renewables alone can’t fill the gap over a five-year time frame.

The world currently has less than 2% spare oil capacity (according to Saudi Aramco), which could swiftly be absorbed by normalizing demand in the airline industry and/or the end of COVID-19 lockdowns in China. The crisis in Ukraine further aggravates an already tight supply position. Re-allocating existing oil and gas supplies worldwide is problematic—for instance, creating the infrastructure to transfer more US and Asian liquid natural gas throughout Europe is a multiyear project.

This leaves a continuing role for new oil and gas exploration as well as production in the interest of energy security. Meeting that need presents a dilemma for the energy industry, as companies need assurances from national governments that they will back capital expenditures in low-carbon secure projects through the term of the project life (typically 10 years). Without government endorsement, oil and gas firms are unlikely to develop the necessary assets. Politicians also face tricky decisions in terms of allocating the cost of transition among consumers.

Investors Have an Important Role, Too

Investors’ aversion to oil and gas companies has curbed these firms’ willingness to invest in upstream oil and gas and led them to divert cashflows to stock buybacks and investment in the energy transition. As a result, new oil and gas supply will likely be constrained and prices will stay higher for longer. Low-income groups, particularly in emerging economies, will be hit the hardest by this expense. Faced with a lack of energy security, affordability and availability, emerging countries, in particular, will simply burn more coal, further increasing environmental damage.

Investors willing to engage with oil and gas management teams to advocate action—rather than shunning them and divesting—can help ensure that these companies have robust energy transition plans in place. Renewables remain a fast-growing but relatively small part of the energy mix, so oil and gas companies continue to be vital for today’s economy. Investors that disregard that fact risk abdicating their responsibility to encourage progress. By actively engaging, they can play a key part in reducing the impact of the current energy crisis and ensuring an orderly evolution to clean energy worldwide.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

About the Authors

David Wheeler, CFA

David Wheeler is a Portfolio Manager for the Sustainable Climate Solutions Portfolio and Senior Research Analyst for the Sustainable Thematic Equities Portfolios, covering the energy, industrials and materials sectors for the portfolio team. Prior to joining the firm in 2008, he was a managing director, analyst and portfolio manager at Neuberger Berman. Before that, Wheeler worked at J.P. Morgan as a research analyst for the energy sector. He holds a BA in economics from Middlebury College, and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York

Jeremy Taylor

Jeremy Taylor is a Senior Vice President, Senior Research Analyst and Portfolio Manager for Value Equities. He is responsible for research coverage of European commodities stocks, including energy, metals and mining, chemicals, and utilities. Taylor is a Portfolio Manager for the Global Commodity Producers strategy and coordinates AB’s Global Commodities Research team as Sector Leader. He joined the firm in 2005 as a research analyst. Previously, Taylor was an associate principal in the industrials group at McKinsey & Company, focusing on business unit strategy, organization, marketing and sales. Prior to that, he was a product manager at Shell Chemicals at Royal Dutch Shell Group. Taylor holds a BS and an MS in electrical and electronic engineering from the University of Manchester. Location: London

This information is for exclusive use of the wholesale person to whom it is provided and is not to be relied upon by any other person. It is not intended for retail or public use and may not be further distributed without prior written consent of ABAL.
This webpage has been prepared by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (“ABAL”)—ABN 53 095 022 718, AFSL 230 698. Information in this webpage is only intended for persons that qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined by the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013’, and is not to be construed as advice. This webpage is provided solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell securities. The information, forecasts and opinions set forth in this webpage have not been prepared for any recipient’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Neither this webpage nor the information contained in it are intended to take the place of professional advice.
You should not take action on specific issues based on the information contained in this webpage without first obtaining professional advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Projections, although based on current information, may not be realized. Information, forecasts and opinions can change without notice and ABAL does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time. Although care has been exercised in compiling the information contained in this webpage, ABAL does not warrant that this webpage is free from errors, inaccuracies or omissions. ABAL disclaims any liability for damage or loss arising from reliance upon any matter contained in this webpage except for statutory liability which cannot be excluded.
No reproduction of the materials on this webpage may be made without the express written permission of ABAL. This information is provided for persons in Australia only and is not being provided for the use of any person who is in any other country.