The page you are attempting to view is not available in the site you previously selected. Please review your site selection or proceed to your home page.
Select Country
AustraliaIcelandPortugalAustria - ÖsterreichItaly - ItaliaSingaporeBelgiumJapan - 日本South Korea - 대한민국CanadaLatin AmericaSpainChina - 中国Luxembourg and Other EMEASwedenFinlandNetherlandsSwitzerlandFranceNew ZealandTaiwan - 台灣Germany - DeutschlandNorwayUKHong Kong - 香港Other Asia-PacificUS (Non-US Citizens/NRC)HungaryPolandUnited States (US Citizens)
menu
Active & Passive Fixed Income Chart

Going Out of Style? Value vs. Growth

13 December 2018
2 min read
US Value and Growth Stocks: Understanding the Elements of Style
US Value and Growth Stocks: Understanding the Elements of Style

As of November 20, 2018
Based on Russell 1000 Growth Index and Russell 1000 Value Index
*Next 12 months
Source: FactSet and AllianceBernstein (AB)

Scott Krauthamer, CFA, CAIA| Global Head—Product Management & Strategy
Eric Sprow, CFA, CAIA| Managing Director—Equities

Recent market gyrations have many people asking: Is it time to pivot from a growth equities allocation to a value equities allocation? But that’s the wrong question. Instead of asking which style is likely to outperform, investors should be asking why they’re performing differently.

US growth stocks surged for much of 2018. In the first three quarters, the Russell 1000 Growth Index advanced by 17.1%, outperforming the Russell 1000 Value Index by 13.2%. But as the markets became more challenging in October, the value index outperformed the growth index by 7.1% through the end of November.

Sector Weights Fuel Performance

What’s behind these performance patterns? Each index is tilted toward different sectors (Display, left). The growth index has large weights in consumer discretionary and technology stocks—both which underperformed in the recent sell-off. The value index is heavily concentrated in the energy and financial sectors. That means its performance is often heavily influenced by the direction of oil prices (which are slumping) and interest rates (which are rising). In October and November, US financial stocks held up relatively well versus other sectors, which supported the relative resilience of value stocks as the broader market declined.

Valuations Are Complex

Valuations are also tricky (Display, right). Based on price/forward earnings—perhaps the most popular valuation metric—value stocks are about 28% cheaper than growth stocks, which are trading at 18.6x. But based on price/earnings to growth (PEG), the growth index is about 21% cheaper than the value index.

Sound confusing? Not really. It just means that after a nine-year bull market, and at a late stage in the US economic cycle, a simplistic choice between value or growth isn’t quite enough. Selective investors can find attractive candidates in both styles. Companies with solid balance sheets and low levels of debt that don’t depend on the economic cycle for growth are good growth candidates, in our view. On the value side, stocks with attractive valuations that stand to benefit from a promising catalyst are worth considering. Value and growth aren’t going out of style—but investors should look beyond the style indices for active strategies that aim to capture return potential in complex market conditions.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

About the Authors

Scott Krauthamer is a Senior Vice President and Global Head of Product Management & Strategy, overseeing AB's global investment products across the firm's equity, fixed income and multi-asset strategies. Prior to joining the firm, he held a variety of investment and product-management roles at Legg Mason, U.S. Trust, Bank of America and J.P. Morgan Private Bank. Krauthamer started his career as an analyst at J.P. Morgan in 1998, and his financial-services experience spans investment-management, quantitative analysis, marketing and business development. He holds a BS in finance and management information systems from the State University of New York, Albany, and is a CFA charterholder and a CAIA designee. Location: Nashville

Eric Sprow is Managing Director of AB's Equities business. In this role, he works extensively with the firm's research and portfolio-management teams, as well as with clients around the world. Previously, Sprow served as an investment specialist for Value Equities. Before joining the firm in 2007, he worked as an equity research analyst and assistant portfolio manager with Croft Leominster, a Baltimore-based investment-management firm. Sprow holds a BA in economics from Washington and Lee University, and is a CFA charterholder and Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst (CAIA). Location: New York

More For You

A row of purple flowers stands elegantly in the foreground of a vast lake and mountain landscape.
Investment Insights
Finding Growth in US Stocks Beyond the Technology Sector

Technology stocks have been the poster child for growth in recent years. Other sectors deserve a closer look today.

John Fogarty, Adam Yee | 30 January 2025
Five blocks with a star in the middle of each are lined up against a window, each casting a shadow forward.
Investment Insights
Five Questions to Ask About Quality in Equity Portfolios

Quality has become a popular buzzword in equity investing. But what does it really mean?

Nelson Yu, Walt Czaicki | 27 January 2025
A kayaker in a red kayak deftly navigates ice floes.
Investment Insights
Can European Stocks Overcome Fallout from “America First” Agenda?

European equity markets may look vulnerable to fallout from new US policies. But some companies offer investors reasons to cheer.

Thorsten Winkelmann, Marcus Morris-Eyton | 21 January 2025

This information is for exclusive use of the wholesale person to whom it is provided and is not to be relied upon by any other person. It is not intended for retail or public use and may not be further distributed without prior written consent of ABAL.
This webpage has been prepared by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (“ABAL”)—ABN 53 095 022 718, AFSL 230 698. Information in this webpage is only intended for persons that qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined by the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013’, and is not to be construed as advice. This webpage is provided solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell securities. The information, forecasts and opinions set forth in this webpage have not been prepared for any recipient’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Neither this webpage nor the information contained in it are intended to take the place of professional advice.
You should not take action on specific issues based on the information contained in this webpage without first obtaining professional advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Projections, although based on current information, may not be realized. Information, forecasts and opinions can change without notice and ABAL does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time. Although care has been exercised in compiling the information contained in this webpage, ABAL does not warrant that this webpage is free from errors, inaccuracies or omissions. ABAL disclaims any liability for damage or loss arising from reliance upon any matter contained in this webpage except for statutory liability which cannot be excluded.
No reproduction of the materials on this webpage may be made without the express written permission of ABAL. This information is provided for persons in Australia only and is not being provided for the use of any person who is in any other country.

© 2025 AllianceBernstein L.P.