Populism Revisited

Expect More Twists and Turns Ahead

14 January 2019
3 min read

What You Need to Know

Updating our two-year-old research on populism, we find that the agenda continues to advance on multiple fronts. Investors should expect more populist policies in the years ahead, which is likely to shift macroeconomic outcomes in a more challenging direction.

19%
Share of votes
for populist parties globally in 2017
10%
Approximate decline
in labor’s income share since 1947
3
Likely results of populist policies:
lower growth, higher inflation, margin pressure

In the second half of 2016, following the Brexit vote and the emergence of Donald Trump as a US presidential candidate, we kicked off a research initiative into the rise of populism. The goal was to understand populism’s drivers, how long the shift might last and what it could mean for the global economy and markets.

Was the tidal shift in politics temporary, reflecting influences such as residual anger from the global financial crisis of 2008–2009, or from the handling of the European sovereign crisis? If this were true, we would see a return to “normal” for politics and policy as economies recovered. Policymaking would revert to what had been its guiding framework since the early 1980s—an emphasis on global openness, independent macroeconomic policy and market deregulation.

But if populism were a structural theme, it would have a much more lasting impact. In this case, populism would reflect long-term trends, including rising inequality, stagnant incomes, fears of disruption and a sense that the political system just wasn’t delivering. In this world, we would see a “new” policy architecture that would likely be delivered through three main channels:

1. Raising the drawbridge, as policies become more local and less global
2. Institutional erosion, with institutions facing attacks or being undermined
3. Redistribution, characterized by efforts to transfer wealth among society’s segments

When we conducted the initial research, our thinking was heavily biased toward viewing populism as a far-reaching structural theme. One of our major conclusions: this political dynamic would likely be a central factor in driving global inflation higher over the medium term.

Two years after that initial research, does populism seem mostly temporary, or does our initial conclusion of a long-term political shift still stand? To answer that question, we first needed to look at how politics and policies have evolved. Based on what we see, the factors driving populism seem to be alive and well.

The Politics: Disillusionment Continues to Grow

The global economic backdrop has continued to improve, with unemployment rates in many developed-market economies sitting at multidecade lows. But despite this progress, the attraction of populist candidates has continued unabated (Display).

Display 1: Populism Is Still On the Rise

Share of Votes for Populist Parties

Display 1: Populism Is Still On the Rise

Through December 31, 2017
Source: Timbro (data extracted using WebPlotDigitizer)

Candidates or parties who paint debates in simple choices—“us” versus “them,” “the people” versus “the corrupt elites” or other constructs—are taking a bigger share of the popular vote. These groups push a similar agenda: at its core, the message is antiestablishment, authoritarian and nativist. Across Europe, these inroads continue a trend that’s been under way since the early 1990s.

It’s not surprising that populists are now in charge in Italy, given how poorly the Italian economy has performed under the European Monetary Union. But even in Germany, recent state electoral results showed a further deterioration of the political center in favor of both the left and right extremes.

Past performance, historical and current analyses, and expectations do not guarantee future results. There can be no assurance that any investment objectives will be achieved. The information contained here reflects the views of AllianceBernstein L.P. or its affiliates and sources it believes are reliable as of the date of this publication. AllianceBernstein L.P. makes no representations or warranties concerning the accuracy of any data. There is no guarantee that any projection, forecast or opinion in this material will be realized. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views expressed here may change at any time after the date of this publication. This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. AllianceBernstein L.P. does not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. It does not take an investor’s personal investment objectives or financial situation into account; investors should discuss their individual circumstances with appropriate professionals before making any decisions. This information should not be construed as sales or marketing material or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, product or service sponsored by AB or its affiliates.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice, or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.

MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations, and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed or produced by MSCI.