Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms Of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?

 

Investing for Security in Unstable Times: Energy and Supply Chains

February 14, 2025
4 min read
James MacGregor, CFA| Chief Investment Officer—US Small and Mid Cap Value Equities; Head—US Value Equities
Cem Inal| Chief Investment Officer—US Large Cap Value Equities; Portfolio Manager—Global Real Estate Securities
Luke Pryor| Portfolio Manager—Security of the Future; Co-Portfolio Manager—Strategic Equities and Responsible US Equities

Efforts to secure supply chains and energy sources are creating powerful and enduring themes for equity investors—even in these turbulent times.

Investors are digesting a barrage of US policy decisions and global technology news that has fueled market volatility. Despite the uncertainties, we think some broad trends will ultimately transcend the market noise and offer attractive opportunities for equity investors with a long-term mindset.

Two major forces have unsettled markets in early 2025. Chinese company DeepSeek unveiled a generative artificial intelligence (AI) model that may have been developed at a fraction of the cost of existing models, raising questions about future AI-related spending. Meanwhile, President Trump’s plans to impose significant tariffs on major trading partners has triggered extraordinary instability, with the Federal Reserve’s Economic Policy Uncertainty Index for trade jumping to a near record high (Display).

Uncertainty over Economic and Trade Policy Has Spiked
Economic Policy Uncertainty Index: Categorical Index—Trade Policy
Line chart shows the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis’s Economic Economic Policy Uncertainty Index for trade from 1985 through early 2025.

Past performance and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
The Economic Policy Uncertainty Index Categorical data include a range of sub-indexes based solely on news data. These are derived using results from the Access World News database of over 2,000 US newspapers.
As of January 31, 2025
Source: Scott R. Baker, Nick Bloom and Stephen J. Davis, "Economic Policy Uncertainty Index: Categorical Index: Trade policy (EPUTRADE)," Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

When dramatic news upends markets, investors may lose confidence in strategic investments. Yet moments like these also create fertile ground for active investors to stay focused on the businesses best positioned to benefit from durable trends.

AI and Energy Security: Myths and Facts

The energy transition is a good example. DeepSeek’s breakthrough has raised questions about the future trajectory of investment in the transition to a more robust domestic power system and US energy security. What’s the connection? Perhaps, some argue, lower development costs of energy-intensive AI technology might reduce the investment needed to improve and upgrade US energy infrastructure below previous forecasts.

We think that conclusion misses the mark, because most of the projected rise in energy and power infrastructure investment has nothing to do with AI. In fact, energy investment is primarily being driven by the need to modernize an aging US power grid and to ensure that generation capacity can support more US manufacturing and consumer demand. And rising demand for US power requires secure energy sources.

US power demand is projected to grow by about 2.5% a year through 2030, according to Goldman Sachs’s estimates (Display), with AI accounting for about a fifth of total growth. As we see it, this implies that even if AI growth falls short of expectations, power demand will still probably grow by at least 2% a year. So continued investment in upgrading US energy infrastructure and securing supply is still vital. If AI spending exceeds expectations, it will make a strong case for energy security even more compelling, in our view.

US Power Demand Is Poised for Growth Regardless of AI Trajectory
Left chart depicts US power demand growth from 2000 through 2030 estimates. Right chart shows a breakdown of sources of projected US power demand growth from 2023 through 2030.

Past performance and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
*Data center numbers do not sum to total due to rounding.
†Excluding data centers
As of December 31, 2024
Source: Goldman Sachs and U.S. Energy Information Administration

What type of businesses could benefit? We believe companies that manufacture equipment or infrastructure for electrification should continue to enjoy solid growth as the quest for energy security plays out. Similarly, equipment makers for industries like natural gas and nuclear energy, which are essential for meeting higher demand, should also see steady gains.

Tariffs and Trade Wars Buoy Supply Chain Investment

President Trump has been pressing ahead with plans to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, as well as a wider set of trading partners. The situation is fluid, but the brewing trade war has compounded concerns about the broader industrial economy and levels of capital investment needed to restore US infrastructure.

While the anxiety is understandable, we think the trade war will actually add another catalyst for US companies to secure supply chains, which in turn, will likely bolster infrastructure investment. For many companies, this is already happening. Since the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global supply chains, companies have been reconfiguring supply chains to reduce the risk of painful production bottlenecks. Concerns about US-China trade tensions have already led many US companies that depended on Chinese suppliers to find alternate sources of supply elsewhere.

Massive spending to secure supply chains is taking place in areas tied to US national security and economic priorities, such as in the semiconductor industry. If anything, the latest round of tariffs has incentivized companies to invest even more to reduce supply chain risk.

Decaying US infrastructure is an obstacle to this process. For years, chronic underinvestment in US ports, airports, roads and power has been a festering problem, which must be addressed in any strategic policy agenda aimed at revitalizing American manufacturing and securing supply chains. Yet in January, Trump sought to eliminate or cut certain components of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021. In our view, infrastructure investment remains an area of rare bipartisan agreement. So after the dust settles, we expect spending on key initiatives to resume, given the urgency.

Despite near-term policy concerns, recent earning trends indicate that some industries are poised to benefit from the push to secure supply chains. Semiconductor equipment is showing signs of recovery even as sales to China slow, based on revenue from Lam Research, one of the industry’s leaders (Display). Logistics in general—and trucking in particular—are stabilizing following a steep decline from pandemic-driven peaks. Spending on cybersecurity continues to power ahead through the turbulence we have seen in the other parts of the economy.

Fortifying Supply Chains: Which Industries May Benefit?
Left chart shows Lam Research revenue growth as a proxy for semiconductor equipment industry. Right chart shows North American Class 8 Truck Orders as a proxy for the logistics industry,

Past performance and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
*Lam Research is a proxy for the semiconductor equipment industry.
As of December 31, 2024
Source: Freight Transportation Research Associates, Lam Research and AllianceBernstein (AB)

For equity investors, security-oriented themes offer a path to capturing attractive sources of long-term returns in an uncertain environment.

Start by identifying industries that are well positioned to capitalize on US efforts to achieve energy independence and supply chain security. Then, use fundamental research to find companies that are exposed to the themes with shares that trade at a discount because of the uncertainty.

To be sure, investors must be attuned to the rapidly changing policy risks. But with a thematic approach to energy and supply chain security, and an emphasis on quality businesses with competitive advantages, we think investors can create an equity portfolio that is positioned to surmount market volatility and to capture resilient sources of long-term return potential.

References to specific securities discussed are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered recommendations by AllianceBernstein L.P.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations, and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams and are subject to change over time.


About the Authors

James MacGregor was appointed Chief Investment Officer of US Small and Mid Cap Value Equities in 2009. In this role, he acts as the lead portfolio manager for AB’s US Small and Mid Cap Value strategies. MacGregor was appointed Head of US Value Equities in 2019, responsible for all US Value portfolios in the areas of business management and talent development. From 2009 to 2012, he also served as CIO of Canadian Value Equities. From 2004 to 2009, MacGregor was director of research for Small and Mid Cap Value Equities, overseeing coverage of companies for the Small Cap and Small/Mid Cap Value services. He started as a research analyst covering a wide number of sectors for those same services. Prior to joining the firm in 1998, MacGregor was a sell-side research analyst at Morgan Stanley, where he covered US packaging and Canadian paper stocks. He also serves as a board member and volunteer for Xavier Mission, a charitable organization that provides basic services and opportunities for empowerment and self-sufficiency to New Yorkers in need. MacGregor holds a BA in economics from McGill University, an MSc in economics from the London School of Economics and an MBA from the University of Chicago. He is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York

Cem Inal was appointed Chief Investment Officer of US Large Cap Value Equities in 2020, after serving as portfolio manager of US Large Cap Value Equities from 2016 until 2019. He has also served as Portfolio Manager of Global Real Estate Securities since 2023. Inal was previously a senior research analyst and leader of the technology sector. He also co-managed the International Small Cap Value service from its inception in 2014 until 2016. Before joining the firm in 2003 as a research analyst, Inal was a vice president at fusionOne, a communications software provider. Prior to that, he was an engagement manager at McKinsey & Company and a research engineer at Mitsubishi Electric. Inal holds a BSE in electrical engineering from Princeton University and an MBA in financial engineering from Cornell University. Location: New York

Luke Pryor is a Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager for the AB Security of the Future Strategy, and Co-Portfolio Manager for the AB Strategic Equities and Responsible US Equities platform. Previously, he was a senior research analyst on the US Large Cap Value team, covering the energy, industrial and materials sectors. Before joining AB in 2019, Pryor was a project leader at the Boston Consulting Group in the principal investors and private equity practice. He holds a BA in economics from Cornell University and an MBA from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, where he was a Palmer Scholar. Location: New York