Debt, Tech and Trade Wars Cloud the Investment Horizon

09 April 2018

5 min read

Global equities posted their first quarterly decline in two years during a volatile first quarter. Growing concerns about rising rates, trade wars and regulation in the technology sector will require a new mindset for investors.

The MSCI World Index fell by 2.3% in the first three months of the year in local-currency terms, with European and Japanese markets falling sharply (Display, left). US stocks were more resilient, but still ended the quarter down slightly. Yet the MSCI Emerging Markets Index advanced by 0.6%. Defensive stocks and resources led the declines (Display, middle), while cyclical stocks held up better. Growth stocks outperformed value stocks.

Stocks Declined Across Most Global Equity Markets in Volatile Quarter

January–March 2018

"As of March 31, 2018

Past performance and current analysis do not guarantee future results.

*Emerging markets represented by MSCI Emerging Markets, US small-caps by Russell 2000, US large-caps by S&P 500, Europe ex UK by MSCI Europe ex UK, Australia by S&P/ASX 300, Japan by TOPIX and UK by FTSE All-Share

†Based on GICS sectors. Resources consists of energy and materials; defensives consists of consumer staples, healthcare, telecom and utilities; and cyclicals consists

of consumer discretionary, industrials and technology.

Source: FactSet, FTSE, MSCI, Russell Investments, S&P, Tokyo Stock Exchange and AllianceBernstein (AB)"

Stocks Declined Across Most Global Equity Markets in Volatile Quarter

As of March 31, 2018
Past performance and current analysis do not guarantee future results.
*Emerging markets represented by MSCI Emerging Markets, US small-caps by Russell 2000, US large-caps by S&P 500, Europe ex UK by MSCI Europe ex UK, Australia by S&P/ASX 300, Japan by TOPIX and UK by FTSE All-Share
†Based on GICS sectors. Resources consists of energy and materials; defensives consists of consumer staples, healthcare, telecom and utilities; and cyclicals consists of consumer discretionary, industrials and technology.
Source: FactSet, FTSE, MSCI, Russell Investments, S&P, Tokyo Stock Exchange and AllianceBernstein (AB)

Volatility returned to the markets after several years of extraordinary calm, as we have anticipated in recent months. For example, the S&P 500 Index rose or fell by at least 1% in 23 trading sessions during the first three months of the year, compared to eight such sessions in all of 2017 (Display above, right). The renewed turbulence was triggered by a confluence of concerns that will require investors to apply new lenses when picking stocks for portfolios.

Rising Rates? Focus on Corporate Debt

Investors around the world have been fixated on the US Federal Reserve’s rate hikes. But this isn’t just an American story. Over time, we expect other countries to begin raising rates too. In other words, the virtuous cycle of global easing that we’ve become accustomed to in recent years could rapidly shift toward a vicious cycle of monetary policy tightening and rising rates, which will affect companies and stocks in many different ways.

Beneath the surface, there are already signs that stocks are becoming more sensitive to rising rates. Our research shows that companies with higher debt ratios underperformed significantly in the first quarter, while companies with lower leverage have outperformed in developed and emerging markets alike (Display, left). Similarly, US large-cap equity funds with relatively low debt/capital ratios have outperformed, while funds with the highest debt ratio have trailed their benchmark (Display, right).

Debt Matters: Highly Leveraged Stocks and Funds Underperformed

Percent

As of March 31, 2018
Past performance and current analysis do not guarantee future results.
*Hedged equity returns of high-leverage and low-leverage companies. High leverage is the top quintile of companies measured by net debt/equity and low leverage is the bottom quintile of companies based on net debt/equity. Net debt/equity is the total of long-term and short-term debt minus cash and cash equivalents divided by the book value of the company’s equity. US stocks are based on companies listed in Russell 1000. Non-US developed market stocks are based on companies listed in MSCI World ex US. Emerging-market stocks are based on companies listed in MSCI Emerging Markets.
†Based on the Morningstar universe of actively managed US large-cap equity funds with assets under management of at least US$10 million. High-debt funds are the highest quintile of funds based on debt/capital and low-debt funds are the lowest quintile of funds based on debt/capital, based on the most recently available holdings.
Source: Morningstar, MSCI, Russell Investments, S&P Compustat, Worldscope and AllianceBernstein (AB)

These performance patterns suggest that investors are paying much closer attention to company balance sheets, as those with more debt could be especially vulnerable to rising rates. Of course, it’s always important to scrutinize a company’s debt burden. But after a decade of historically low interest rates, companies that have borrowed too much could be especially vulnerable, while those with less debt could become more attractive.

Technology Turmoil? Cash Flow Is King

The technology sector is a case in point. Technology companies around the world have a lot of cash on their balance sheets—and tech stocks outperformed the market during the first quarter.

Yet the underlying strengths of technology stocks were obscured by concerns about Facebook. Shares of Facebook tumbled in March amid revelations that it been imprudent with user data and may face tighter regulatory scrutiny. Sentiment soured toward US mega-cap technology and new media stocks known as the FAANGs (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google).

But the FAANGs are only part of the technology sector story today. In fact, companies in many parts of the broader technology sector are benefiting from continuing global economic growth and a growing demand for innovation. These trends have supported solid earnings growth—and cash-flow growth—across the technology sector in recent years.

Strong cash flows are the most important distinguishing characteristic of the technology sector, in our view. Even if inflation begins to surface, many companies will continue to invest in technology, as it creates new disruptive businesses, helps offset rising labor costs, improves efficiency and preserves profit margins in a more challenging market. It may be time for investors to consider technology stocks as a potential hedge against rising inflation.

Trade Wars? Cut Through the Noise

Perhaps the biggest evolving challenge to hit the markets during the first quarter was the growing threat of a trade war. In late March, President Trump unveiled plans to impose tariffs on $60 billion worth of Chinese goods, triggering a sharp drop in global stocks amid concerns that an all-out trade war could deliver a blow to the global economy.

It’s still too soon to say that the US tariffs will lead to an all-out trade war. Much will depend on whether the trade tensions remain limited to bilateral blows between the US and China, and to what extent potential retaliatory measures lead to escalation. If the US–China situation deteriorates, economic growth in both countries would likely get hit, which could drag down the global economy and jeopardize stocks in general. That said, we think investors should begin to investigate what types of companies, industries and countries could win or lose if an all-out trade war erupts.

For example, US technology groups with large and complex supply chains in China may face disruption as they are forced to find new sources for components. Other industries such as clothing could be forced to close Chinese operations, shifting sourcing to countries such as Vietnam and Indonesia. While these supply chains would ultimately adjust, there could be significant uncertainty and the potential for inventory shortages along the way, adding to investors’ worries.

Major Shifts Require a Skillful Approach

What do these three developments have in common? First, they all represent a major shift in underlying long-term market foundations, from three decades of declining interest rates to a potential reversal of a longstanding favorable backdrop for world trade. Second, decades of growing trade and integration could reverse.

Inflation is a thread that ties everything together. Inflationary pressures are already rising, particularly in the US, as the slack in the economy that has lingered since the global financial crisis has narrowed. New tariffs could lead to higher prices, which would spur a faster increase in interest rates that would lead to greater differentiation in the performance of different sectors. This has already started to happen, as indicated in the performance of companies with higher debt levels.

This environment will put active equity investors to the test. In complex and changing market conditions, we believe that portfolio managers who demonstrate an ability to adjust quickly will be rewarded for their skill.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.

This information is for exclusive use of the wholesale person to whom it is provided and is not to be relied upon by any other person. It is not intended for retail or public use and may not be further distributed without prior written consent of ABAL.
This webpage has been prepared by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (“ABAL”)—ABN 53 095 022 718, AFSL 230 698. Information in this webpage is only intended for persons that qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined by the Corporations Act 2001, and is not to be construed as advice. This webpage is provided solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell securities. The information, forecasts and opinions set forth in this webpage have not been prepared for any recipient’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Neither this webpage nor the information contained in it are intended to take the place of professional advice.
You should not take action on specific issues based on the information contained in this webpage without first obtaining professional advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Projections, although based on current information, may not be realized. Information, forecasts and opinions can change without notice and ABAL does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time. Although care has been exercised in compiling the information contained in this webpage, ABAL does not warrant that this webpage is free from errors, inaccuracies or omissions. ABAL disclaims any liability for damage or loss arising from reliance upon any matter contained in this webpage except for statutory liability which cannot be excluded.
No reproduction of the materials on this webpage may be made without the express written permission of ABAL. This information is provided for persons in Australia only and is not being provided for the use of any person who is in any other country.