Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy & Regulation Responsible Investing (ESG) Tech and Innovation Alternatives Equities Fixed Income Multi-Asset Blog

AI Ethics and Regulation: How Investors Can Navigate the Maze

30 May 2024

5 min read

Jonathan Berkow| Director of Quantitative Research and Data Science—Equities

From potentially brand-damaging ethical risks to regulatory uncertainty, AI poses challenges for investors. But there is a path forward.

Artificial intelligence (AI) poses many ethical issues that can translate into risks for consumers, companies and investors. And AI regulation, which is developing unevenly across multiple jurisdictions, adds to the uncertainty. The key for investors, in our view, is to focus on transparency and explainability.

The ethical issues and risks of AI begin with the developers who create the technology. From there, they flow to the developers’ clients—companies that integrate AI into their businesses—and on to consumers and society more broadly. Through their holdings in AI developers and companies that use AI, investors are exposed to both ends of the risk chain.

AI is developing quicky, far ahead of most people’s understanding of it. Among those trying to catch up are global regulators and lawmakers. At first glance, their activity in the AI area has grown quickly in the last few years; many countries have released related strategies and others are close to introducing them (Display).

Global Development of AI Policies and Regulation

Activity Is High, but Progress Is Uneven

World map shows most countries outside of Africa have released or are developing a national AI strategy.

For illustrative purposes only.
Through December 31, 2022
Source: AI, Algorithmic and Automation Incidents and Controversies (AIAAIC) Repository; and Nestor Maslej, Loredana Fattorini, Erik Brynjolfsson, John Etchemendy, Katrina Ligett, Terah Lyons, James Manyika, Helen Ngo, Juan Carlos Niebles, Vanessa Parli, Yoav Shoham, Russell Wald, Jack Clark and Raymond Perrault, The AI Index 2023 Annual Report, AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, April 2023.

In reality, the progress has been uneven and is far from complete. There is no uniform approach to AI regulation across jurisdictions, and some countries introduced their regulations before ChatGPT launched in late 2022. As AI proliferates, many regulators will need to update and possibly expand the work they’ve already done.

For investors, the regulatory uncertainty compounds AI’s other risks. To understand and assess how to deal with these risks, it helps to have an overview of the AI business, ethical and regulatory landscape.

Data Risks Can Damage Brands

AI involves an array of technologies directed toward performing tasks normally done by humans and performing them in a human-like way. AI and business can intersect through generative AI, which includes various forms of content generation, including video, voice, text and music; and large language models (LLMs), a subset of generative AI focused on natural language processing. LLMs serve as foundational models for various AI applications—such as chatbots, automated content creation, and analyzing and summarizing large volumes of information—that companies are increasingly using in their customer engagement.

As many companies have found, however, AI innovations may involve potentially brand-damaging risks. These can arise from biases inherent in the data on which LLMs are trained and have resulted, for example, in banks inadvertently discriminating against minorities in granting home-loan approvals, and in a US health insurance provider facing a class-action lawsuit alleging that its use of an AI algorithm caused extended-care claims for elderly patients to be wrongfully denied.

Bias and discrimination are just two of the risks that regulators target and that should be on investors’ radars; others include intellectual property rights and privacy considerations concerning data. Risk-mitigation measures—such as developer testing of the performance, accuracy and robustness of AI models, and providing companies with transparency and support in implementing AI solutions—should also be scrutinized.

Dive Deep to Understand AI Regulations

The AI regulatory environment is evolving in different ways and at different speeds across jurisdictions. The most recent developments include the European Union (EU)’s Artificial Intelligence Act, which is expected to come into force around mid-2024, and the UK government’s response to a consultation process triggered last year by the launch of the governmemt’s AI regulation white paper.

Both efforts illustrate how AI regulatory approaches can differ. The UK is adopting a principles-based framework that existing regulators can apply to AI issues within their respective domains. In contrast, the EU act introduces a comprehensive legal framework with risk-graded compliance obligations for developers, companies, and importers and distributors of AI systems.

Investors, in our view, should do more than drill down into the specifics of each jurisdiction’s AI regulations. They should also familiarize themselves with how jurisdictions are managing AI issues using laws that predate and stand outside AI-specific regulations—for example, copyright law to address data infringements and employment legislation in cases where AI has an impact on labor markets.

Fundamental Analysis and Engagement Are Key

A good rule of thumb for investors trying to assess AI risk is that companies that proactively make full disclosures about their AI strategies and policies are likely to be well prepared for new regulations. More generally, fundamental analysis and issuer engagement—the basics of responsible investment—are crucial to this area of research.

Fundamental analysis should delve not only into AI risk factors at the company level but also along the business chain and across the regulatory environment, testing insights against core responsible-AI principles (Display).

Using AI Responsibly: An All-Around View for Investors

A stylized representation of 10 core principles for responsible AI, including privacy, fairness, reliability and auditability.

For illustrative purposes only.
Source: AllianceBernstein (AB)

Engagement conversations can be structured to cover AI issues not only as they affect business operations, but from environmental, social and governance perspectives, too. Questions for investors to ask boards and management include the following:

AI integration: How has the company integrated AI into its overall business strategy? What are some specific examples of AI applications within the company?
Board oversight and expertise: How does the board ensure it has sufficient expertise to effectively oversee the company’s AI strategy and implementation? Are there any specific training programs or initiatives in place?
Public commitment to responsible AI: Has the company published a formal policy or framework on responsible AI? How does this policy align with industry standards, ethical AI considerations, and AI regulation?
Proactive transparency: Does the company have any proactive transparency measures in place to withstand future regulatory implications?
Risk management and accountability: What risk management processes does the company have in place to identify and mitigate AI-related risks? Is there delegated responsibility for overseeing these risks?
Data challenges in LLMs: How does the company address privacy and copyright challenges associated with the input data used to train large language models? What measures are in place to ensure input data is compliant with privacy regulations and copyright laws, and how does the company handle restrictions or requirements related to input data?
Bias and fairness challenge in generative AI systems: What steps does the company take to prevent and/or mitigate biased or unfair outcomes from its AI systems? How does the company ensure that the output of any generative AI systems used are fair, unbiased, and do not perpetuate discrimination or harm to any individual or group?
Incident tracking and reporting: How does the company track and report on incidents related to its development or use of AI, and what mechanisms are in place for addressing and learning from these incidents?
Metrics and Reporting: What metrics does the company use to measure the performance and impact of its AI systems, and how are these metrics reported to external stakeholders? How does the company maintain due diligence in monitoring the regulatory compliance of its AI applications?

Ultimately, the best way for investors to find their way through the maze is to stay grounded and skeptical. AI is a complex and fast-moving technology. Investors should insist on clear answers and not be unduly impressed by elaborate or complicated explanations.

The authors would like to thank Roxanne Low, ESG Analyst with AB’s Responsible Investing team, for her research contributions.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

About the Author

Jonathan Berkow

Jonathan Berkow is a Senior Vice President and the Director of Quantitative Research and Data Science in the Equities division at AB. He leads the research and adoption of alternative data in equity research and systematic strategies. Prior to joining the firm in 2018, Berkow was a systematic portfolio manager and researcher at hedge funds Element Capital Management and Kepos Capital. He started his career at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, where he managed quantitative research and was a portfolio manager for global equity portfolios. Berkow's research has spanned equities and macro asset classes. He holds a BS in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Location: New York

This information is for exclusive use of the wholesale person to whom it is provided and is not to be relied upon by any other person. It is not intended for retail or public use and may not be further distributed without prior written consent of ABAL.
This webpage has been prepared by AllianceBernstein Australia Limited (“ABAL”)—ABN 53 095 022 718, AFSL 230 698. Information in this webpage is only intended for persons that qualify as “wholesale clients,” as defined by the Corporations Act 2001, and is not to be construed as advice. This webpage is provided solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell securities. The information, forecasts and opinions set forth in this webpage have not been prepared for any recipient’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Neither this webpage nor the information contained in it are intended to take the place of professional advice.
You should not take action on specific issues based on the information contained in this webpage without first obtaining professional advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Projections, although based on current information, may not be realized. Information, forecasts and opinions can change without notice and ABAL does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time. Although care has been exercised in compiling the information contained in this webpage, ABAL does not warrant that this webpage is free from errors, inaccuracies or omissions. ABAL disclaims any liability for damage or loss arising from reliance upon any matter contained in this webpage except for statutory liability which cannot be excluded.
No reproduction of the materials on this webpage may be made without the express written permission of ABAL. This information is provided for persons in Australia only and is not being provided for the use of any person who is in any other country.