Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms Of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?

 

To Keep Bad Spirits at Bay, Avoid CCC Corporates

27 October 2015
2 min read
| Director—Income Strategies

Investors attempting to hide from rising rates by choosing investments with significant amounts of CCC-rated corporate bonds could be whistling in the dark—and exposing themselves to a more ominous kind of risk.

As the US Federal Reserve makes plans to raise interest rates, many investors fear the fallout on their fixed-income portfolios. But trying to avoid interest-rate risk by investing in funds with an abundance of CCC-rated corporate bonds—the riskiest part of the high-yield bond market—may not be a sensible alternative.

Beware Credit Risk

While it’s true that CCC bonds have little to no interest-rate risk, what has an even more terrifying effect on a portfolio is credit risk, or the chance of a bond defaulting. Interest-rate risk, on the other hand, may be resolved over time, as portfolios tend to bounce back after a while.

When it comes to high yield, CCC-rated bonds can look enticing, but it’s usually best to steer clear of them. Their higher yields are a lure to investors—and we occasionally do see opportunities in that part of the market. But as we’ve been saying for some time, the rewards seem too little to justify the risk.

So far in 2015, CCCs are down 6.5%, while BB-rated bonds are up 1%. And on a risk-adjusted basis, CCCs look unattractive. After adjusting their yield spreads by the expected default losses, CCCs and lower-rated bonds actually offer lower yield premiums than B-rated bonds—and about the same as BB bonds, which have much less credit risk (Display). We expect this environment to continue as we move into the later stages of the credit cycle, because highly levered companies are likely to come under even more pressure.

To Keep Bad Spirits At Bay, Avoid CCC Corporates

All things considered, we see better value in bonds rated B and BB these days. Investors may sacrifice some nominal yield by investing in these issues, but they’d also scale back their risk. This may not sound like an attractive compromise to some, but when you consider that there’s greater potential for a credit scare, this approach starts to make more sense.

Don’t Get Caught in the CCC Web

We think a global, diversified approach to credit is a better strategy for investors, and B and BB bonds should be a part of it. When considering credit investments, make sure to ask a straightforward question: Am I going to get my money back? For select CCC-rated bonds, that answer might make an investment worthwhile. But in general, the answer is likely to be, “I’m not sure.” If that’s the case, don’t be tempted by the possibility of extra CCC yield. The results could be frightening.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.


About the Author

Gershon Distenfeld is a Senior Vice President, Director of Income Strategies and a member of the firm’s Operating Committee. He is responsible for the portfolio management and strategic growth of AB’s income platform with almost $60B in assets under management. This includes the multiple-award-winning Global High Yield and American Income portfolios, flagship fixed-income funds on the firm’s Luxembourg-domiciled fund platform for non-US investors. Distenfeld also oversees AB’s public leveraged finance business. He joined AB in 1998 as a fixed-income business analyst and served in the following roles: high-yield trader (1999–2002), high-yield portfolio manager (2002–2006), director of High Yield (2006–2015), director of Credit (2015–2018) and co-head of Fixed Income (2018–2023). Distenfeld began his career as an operations analyst supporting Emerging Markets Debt at Lehman Brothers. He holds a BS in finance from the Sy Syms School of Business at Yeshiva University and is a CFA charterholder. Location: Nashville