Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms Of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?

 

Income Investing When (Trade) Tensions Run High

11 September 2019
3 min read
| Managing Director, Senior Investment Strategist and Head—Income and Systematic Fixed Income Business Development

Trade tensions—and the volatility they bring—are forcing investors to think about new ways to generate low-volatility income. We think a mortgage income strategy that balances high-quality securities with historically high-returning ones can help.

When it comes to income-oriented investing, we’ve long advocated a strategy that pairs return-seeking credit assets—high-yield corporate bonds, emerging-market debt and so on—with high-quality government bonds. This approach has historically reduced volatility and limited drawdowns, making it especially valuable late in the credit cycle.

But investors can do even more to reduce volatility sparked by geopolitical risk by adding mortgage strategies to their asset allocation. Why?

Because mortgage-backed securities are more resilient than high-yield credit to geopolitical risk. Consider the higher-yielding assets on the return-seeking side of the mortgage strategy, such as commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and credit risk–transfer (CRT) securities—a kind of bundled residential mortgage debt. As Display 1 shows, both have weathered the ups and downs of the US-China trade war better than high-yield credit.

Mortgage-Based Assets Weather Rougher Trade Winds
Mortgage-Based Assets Weather Rougher Trade Winds

Through May 31, 2019
Historical analyses do not guarantee future results. CRTs and CMBS are represented by bonds (including CMBX.6 holdings) held in those sectors in an AB-managed fixed-income portfolio, and are therefore not intended to represent a generally accepted proxy/benchmark for these markets. For illustrative purposes only.

Over the long run, complementary allocations to credit- and mortgage-focused income strategies may help smooth the returns of the overall mix, as the two have tended to outperform at different times.

US Housing Still Strong

Here’s another reason to consider adding mortgage exposure: US home affordability has improved lately in most US regions and US consumer spending remains healthy. While we expect US economic growth to slow, we’re not forecasting a contraction. And lower interest rates should bring down mortgage rates. We expect US home prices to rise in the coming months, albeit at a slower pace (Display 2).

US Housing Market Outlook Still Solid
US Housing Market Outlook Still Solid

Left display through January 1, 2019; right display through February 28, 2019.
Historical and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
Source: Freddie Mac, Morgan Stanley, National Association of Realtors, S&P Case-Shiller, US Census Bureau and AllianceBernstein (AB)

As a result, we still see opportunity in CRTs, issued by US government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These assets pool thousands of mortgages into single securities that provide investors with regular payments based on the underlying loans’ performance. Unlike typical agency bonds, CRTs don’t carry a government guarantee, so investors may absorb losses if large numbers of loans default. Even so, high borrower credit quality makes CRTs attractive; many have been upgraded to investment-grade status.

CMBS are also attractive and offer a healthy yield pickup over similarly rated corporate bonds. Investor worries about CMBS—particularly those backed by shopping malls—have driven down prices, making many attractive opportunities for investors who can do their homework. But it’s important to be selective because credit fundamentals have deteriorated for securities issued after 2014.

On the higher-quality side of the scale, investors may want to consider higher-quality CMBS, highly-rated collateralized loan obligations, agency mortgage-backed securities from Fannie and Freddie, which carry a government guarantee of principal, and select exposure to consumer-oriented consumer asset-backed securities (auto and consumer loans).

Complementary Income and a Smoother Ride

Much like a traditional credit-based income approach, the manager of a mortgage income strategy can adjust the balance between high-quality assets and higher-yielding ones as valuations and conditions change.

Just as important, securitized assets have exhibited a low correlation with government debt, which plays a key role on the risk-reducing side of the traditional credit income strategy. They’re also relatively uncorrelated to credit and equities, making them a powerful portfolio diversifier.

The way we see it, pairing credit- and mortgage-focused income strategies in a single portfolio can help generate decent income and reduce drawdowns.

The global outlook is increasingly uncertain, and with no end in sight to the US-China trade war, we expect high volatility to persist as we head into 2020. For income-oriented investors, that scenario will require some creative thinking. A “satellite” allocation to mortgages may help investors cushion a more traditional income allocation that leans heavily on high-yield bonds.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.


About the Author

Monika Carlson is a Managing Director, Senior Investment Strategist, and Head of the Income and Systematic platforms for the Fixed Income Business Development team. She is responsible for leading a team of investment strategists and product managers and for driving growth efforts on AB’s fixed-income platform. Additionally, as part of her client-facing role, Carlson represents AB’s market views and portfolio strategies to clients, prospects and consultants globally. She has held several roles at AB, including as the head of the Global Offshore Retail Platform in Product Management. Prior to joining AB in 2007, Carlson worked at Neuberger Berman. She holds a BBA in finance from Baruch College at the City University of New York and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York