Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms Of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?

 

ECB’s Surprise Taper Decision Comes with Economic Risk

16 March 2022
4 min read
| Director—Developed Market Economic Research
At its March 10 meeting, the European Central Bank (ECB) surprised the market by announcing an acceleration of its tapering program—wrapping up securities purchases earlier than anticipated. Most investors had expected the ECB to delay any changes to its purchases until at least the next policy meeting, especially after comments from senior members suggesting the need for patience.
 
The ECB’s new schedule calls for reducing securities purchases to €40 billion in April, €30 billion in May and €20 billion in June.  By extension—and barring any unforeseen development—purchases will likely wrap up in the third quarter of this year. Ending the purchase program would allow for the ECB to hike rates soon thereafter.

Was an Accelerated Taper Premature? 

The ECB characterized the decision as taking a middle ground between two extremes: 1) doing nothing and waiting to see how the crisis plays out or 2) reacting more aggressively to the runup in inflation that’s about to get worse. Inflation is the crux of the ECB’s mandate, and the central bank wants to have all options open as the year progresses.

There’s no doubt that this is a challenging juncture for formulating monetary policy. But in our view, the ECB wouldn’t have foreclosed any of its options by doing nothing last week and waiting another policy meeting cycle. By being hawkish at last week’s meeting, the ECB risks worsening an economic situation that’s already deteriorating rapidly.    

Unsurprisingly, the market reaction to the hawkish surprise saw interest rates rise, peripheral spreads widen and equities fall. Those developments represent a tightening of financial conditions that we believe is inappropriate for the current economic situation. Easy financial conditions have been a key pillar of growth both in Europe and globally over the last several quarters and, as conditions tighten, the forward growth outlook will deteriorate.  Rising peripheral spreads, in particular, threaten the ability of governments to support populations facing a massive shock to real incomes from rising energy prices. 

Risk of Euro-Area Recession Has Increased

While there’s still much uncertainty, we believe that the Russian invasion of Ukraine, combined with less monetary policy support from the ECB, pushes the risk of a recession in the euro area above 50%. In fact, a recession in the next few quarters is now our base case for several reasons. 

1.       Even before the invasion, euro-area consumers were already struggling to keep pace with rising prices as the real, or inflation-adjusted, aggregate paycheck had started to shrink (Display).

2.       Unless the spike in energy prices reverses almost immediately, it will push inflation higher and real incomes lower—a grim outlook for euro-area consumers.

3.       There’s the possibility of rationing for energy and other commodities that Europe typically imports from Russia or Ukraine.

4.        Economic sentiment could be hurt by the combination of supply shortfalls, rising prices and—of course—the war itself. 

Euro-Area Real Incomes Are Already Stagnant
Nominal and Inflation-Adjusted Paycheck, Year-over-Year Percent Change
Annual growth in nominal and inflation-adjusted paychecks since 2006

Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Through February 28, 2022
Source: Refinitiv Datastream

We see the euro area facing an imminent demand shortfall, which we think calls for dovish—not hawkish—monetary policy. The situation today in many ways parallels the one prevailing around the 2011 ECB rate hike, in which policymakers responded to an energy shock by raising rates, only to see the economy turn downward. By the end of that year, the ECB was again cutting rates.

The Path from Here

A recession isn’t a certainty at this point. Hostilities could cease in short order and trade flows resume, presumably accompanied by falling energy prices. Or euro-area leaders could agree on a significant fiscal package to support consumers (though the recent rise in interest rates would make that package more expensive). And, of course, the ECB has made it clear that rate hikes aren’t inevitable.  

The euro area’s economic starting point is relatively robust, based on Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) surveys, the best indicator of euro-area growth (Display). However, the latest readings predate both the war and the rise in energy prices. We expect PMIs to fall sharply over the next few weeks, and the European economy to slide in line with that signal. 

Strong PMI Doesn’t Yet Reflect War and Energy Price Spike
Eurozone Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ Index
Eurozone manufacturing and services Purchasing Managers’ Index since 2006

Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Through February 28, 2022
Source: Refinitiv Datastream

Ongoing negotiations among European leaders could, of course, change the picture. For instance, a fiscal innovation would likely offset some of the negativity in the current economic environment. Failing that, we’ll have to wait and watch for improvement in the geopolitical situation before becoming more optimistic about the euro area’s economic outlook.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations, and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams and are subject to change over time.


About the Authors

Eric Winograd is a Senior Vice President and Director of Developed Market Economic Research. He joined the firm in 2017. From 2010 to 2016, Winograd was the senior economist at MKP Capital Management, a US-based diversified alternatives manager. From 2008 to 2010, he was the senior macro strategist at HSBC North America. Earlier in his career, Winograd worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the World Bank. He holds a BA (cum laude) in Asian studies from Dartmouth College and an MA in international studies from the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies. Location: New York