Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms Of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?

 

Early Groundwork Is Key for Implementing Lifetime Income Solutions

January 13, 2025
5 min read
Jennifer DeLong| Managing Director, Head—Defined Contribution; President—AllianceBernstein Trust Company
Andrew Stumacher| Managing Director—Custom Defined Contribution Solutions

Engaging up front with four key workstreams may smooth the process of adding a solution. 

Adding a lifetime income solution to a defined contribution (DC) plan can be one of the most important decisions plan sponsors can make, because these solutions may help put participants on a path to achieving security in retirement. Establishing a thorough process and following best practices may help keep things on track when moving from intention to implementation.

Part of the journey involves narrowing the burgeoning field of solutions to a short list worthy of closer evaluation. We think working through four key questions can help whittle down the offerings in play. As this list takes shape, plan sponsors can lay the groundwork for a smooth implementation by engaging early—and productively—with key workstreams.

Based on our experience in partnering with plan sponsors, here are a few considerations:

Talk to recordkeepers about the intent to offer a lifetime income solution. Recordkeepers are vital gateways to plan participants, through regular touch points ranging from account statements to customer-service calls and educational content. All these elements will need to incorporate information on the lifetime income solution to maximize the positive impact on participants.

Some recordkeepers are more comfortable being facilitators between solution providers and individuals; others take great pride in creating a holistic financial-education experience for individual participants. Recordkeepers, always key stakeholders in making solutions work, may need to go a step further to integrate them into their participant experience.

Go back in time a few years, and lifetime income solutions were a new frontier in the DC world. Some plan sponsors may assume this is still the case. But today, we’re seeing more recordkeepers than ever supporting these offerings on their platforms through integration with product providers such as asset managers and insurance companies. At times, recordkeepers combine income solutions into existing offerings, such as their own managed-account services or wealth guidance.

For plan sponsors, a helpful to-do item is to inform recordkeepers about the type or types of solutions they’re homing in on. The recordkeeper might already offer it or—if not—be willing to add it. It helps to understand the time frame required for a recordkeeper to add a specific solution well in advance of zeroing in on a choice.

Build a communications strategy that engages all participants. Every lifetime income solution requires communication—and it must be clear and targeted. Decide on the main message early, making sure both treasury and benefits professionals weigh in—as well as internal legal experts. Dedicate specific resources to sharpening the communications strategy and focus on the benefits.

The core message should be consistent and simple, delivered across diverse channels and media: some participants prefer watching videos and animations, others want a human voice to speak with. Still others like to “do it themselves” on a website. Our participant research distinguishes three investor personas with distinct needs and capabilities that offers insight into communication strategy.

Capable investors are confident and more financially literate—they could benefit from articles discussing the ins and outs of lifetime-income strategies. And they may be perfectly at home using web-based self-service tools. Eager investors are younger and less financially literate, so social media could be an effective way to succinctly describe the merits of glide paths that incorporate guaranteed income. Conservative investors tend to be more cautious, and could be helped by insights on why staying invested in a diversified strategy may be better for growing retirement income potential than a risk-averse strategy. Speaking with call center representatives might be preferable for this cohort.

Tailoring a communication strategy for lifetime income solutions may help ensure that all participants receive the information they need in a way that resonates. For human resources teams that might worry that communications content and strategy will be a heavy lift, one option is to tap into solutions providers that offer this service and the experience in deploying it.

Perform legal and fiduciary due diligence—and document it. The good news for plan sponsors pursuing a lifetime income solution is that there’s no shortage of regulatory guidance for incorporating one within a plan.

The SECURE Act, passed in 2019, includes a safe-harbor provision for choosing an annuity provider if plan fiduciaries conduct thorough due diligence in evaluating them. The default safe harbor from 2006 covers qualified default investment alternatives, with guidance that provides support for incorporating insurance products. We won't dive deep into the specifics of these regulations here, but we believe they offer a solid foundation for due diligence. It’s essential to document this process clearly.

Consultants may be a valuable resource—they’ve upped their coverage of lifetime-income solutions and can help guide plan sponsors through the process. Legal experts may also be useful in understanding fiduciary considerations for lifetime income solutions. And there are plan sponsors who have navigated or are navigating the process. At this point, over 30 DC plans have publicly announced that they’ve selected lifetime income solutions or are putting one in place. Many would likely be willing to share their first-hand experiences.

Lay the groundwork with operations and administration. In our experience, engaging partners in these disciplines will make it easier for them to adapt existing infrastructure to an incoming solution when the time arrives. You don’t want to reach what you think is the end of the road and then have to hit the “pause” button because you’ve overlooked a key stakeholder requirement.

Other stakeholders should be brought into the fold early on. Investment managers, custodians and third parties may be partnering with a plan in benefit administration, participant education or communications. A plan might already be engaging with insurance companies if they’ve undergone a pension risk transfer for their defined benefit plan.

These conversations could end up influencing the ultimate solution choice; having a dialogue early on could avoid implementation challenges further down the road. Ensure that the plan’s foundations will support a lifetime income solution that meets the unique, diverse needs of participants into the future. 

"Target date" in a fund's name refers to the approximate year when a plan participant expects to retire and begin withdrawing from his or her account. Target-date funds gradually adjust their asset allocation, lowering risk as a participant nears retirement. Investments in target-date funds are not guaranteed against loss of principal at any time, and account values can be more or less than the original amount invested—including at the time of the fund's target date. Also, investing in target-date funds does not guarantee sufficient income in retirement.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.


About the Authors

Jennifer DeLong is a Senior Vice President, Managing Director and Head of Defined Contribution, responsible for leading AB’s defined contribution business in North America. She oversees product management and development, marketing, participant communications, and client services for the firm’s institutional custom target-date and lifetime income solution clients. Additionally, DeLong is responsible for firm’s Collective Investment Trust business and is President of the AllianceBernstein Trust Company. Since joining AB in 1999, she has held various senior client relationship management, product management and marketing roles, all primarily focused on defined contribution, 529 college savings plans and sub-advisory insurance services for both institutional and retail clients. Before joining the firm, DeLong worked in various sales, marketing and client relationship management roles for both small and mega-sized defined contribution plans. She holds a BS in business management with a minor in international business from The College of New Jersey, as well as FINRA Series 6 and 63 licenses. Location: New York

Andrew Stumacher is a Senior Vice President and Managing Director for AB’s Customized Defined Contribution Solutions. He is responsible for developing, implementing and driving the growth of custom target-date, model portfolio and retirement income strategies for the large and mega-size institutional plan market, in which AB serves as one of the largest managers in the US. Stumacher works in close collaboration with plan sponsors, consultants and external business partners to develop innovative and flexible products to improve outcomes for DC plans and participants. He joined the firm in 2004 as a marketing analyst, focusing on strategy and development for new institutional products. From 2011 to 2017, Stumacher managed the integration of AB’s DC products with recordkeepers, trustees, custodians, insurers and investment managers as the DC partner relationship officer. He holds a BS in applied economics and management from Cornell University and an MBA from Wagner College as well as the Certified Annuity Specialist™ designation from the Institute of Business & Finance. Location: New York