Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms Of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?

 

Alternative Risk Premia

Why Diversify Beyond Style?

May 30, 2019
2 min read
| Managing Director and Head—Multi-Asset Business Development, Americas

In the world of alternative risk premia, style premia have dominated. But they do have limitations. Investors should consider using a wider variety of strategies.

Style premia strategies are the most well-known and popular of the alternative risk premia (ARP) strategies. That’s why many investors’ portfolios are exposed primarily to this part of the ARP universe. These strategies aim to add value by allocating to well-known risk factors, within and across asset classes. However, an exclusive reliance on style premia can leave investors vulnerable in certain environments: for instance, when market conditions become volatile and unpredictable with rapid switchbacks, as in 2018. In the following simplified example, we show how and why the inclusion of just one differentiated ARP strategy can start to address this weakness.

Event-Driven—a Highly Differentiated Strategy

Event-driven ARP strategies identify securities that are subject to activist, merger arbitrage, acquisition or spin-off activity. These strategies create portfolios systematically, based on securities with the most positive characteristics and conforming to specific cost, risk and liquidity criteria. Event-driven premia have historically been uncorrelated and even negatively correlated with the style premia complex of value, size, quality, momentum and low volatility (Display).

Event-Driven Has Exhibited Low Correlations with Style Premia

12-Month Roll Correlation

Event-Driven Has Exhibited Low Correlations with Style Premia

Historical analyses do not guarantee future results.
Through 31 December 2018
Source: AllianceBernstein (AB)

Time Factor—an Important Diversification Property

Event-driven strategies mostly have a relatively short time horizon, geared to the completion or non-completion of a specific corporate event. As a result, the pay-offs from a portfolio of event-driven strategies come in frequent, discrete “wins” at short intervals. By contrast, style-driven strategies are subject to wider thematic influences and pay-off over longer time horizons. Their “half-life”—the point at which investments lose half their value-adding potential—can extend from three months to two years for the most popular style strategies (as we show in the Display, below).

This means it may take investors months or even years to reap the benefits of these allocations. This difference in time horizons helps explain why event-driven strategies are so complementary with style premia.

Style Premia Pay off over Extended Periods

Theme Time Horizon Exposure Half-Life (Days)

Style Premia Pay off over Extended Periods

Historical analyses do not guarantee future results.
As of 31 December 2018
Source: AllianceBernstein (AB)

Beware Of Event-Driven Risks

Event-driven strategies do, however, introduce different risks—primarily through cross-over holdings with hedge funds and therefore exposure to the leveraging and de-leveraging decisions of the hedge-fund community. To help offset that exposure, we think a robust ARP portfolio should include additional diversifying strategies over and above event-driven.

These comprise not only style premia, but also a wide range of hedge-fund premia including: global macro; structural premia including mean reversion and volatility strategies; and cross-asset premia based on arbitraging factors across multiple asset classes. In our view, using the complete ARP opportunity set can create more robust portfolios with strong return-generating potential that can help investors transcend style turbulence.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.


About the Author

Mark Gleason is a Vice President, Managing Director and Head of the Americas Multi-Asset Business Development team, where he's broadly responsible for portfolio strategy and communications. He joined AB in 2009. Previously, Gleason was a director on the Multi-Asset team, with an explicit focus on the group's alternative and risk-managed solutions. Before that, he served as a Multi-Asset product specialist and as a regional consultant in the US Retail Group. Gleason holds a BBA in business economics from Loyola University Maryland and is a CFA charterholder. Location: Nashville