Terms and Conditions

Please read these conditions carefully before using this site. By using this site, you signify your assent to the following terms and conditions of use without limitation or qualification. In particular, you consent to the use of all cookies on this website for the purposes described in the terms of use. If you do not agree to these terms or to the use of cookies as described below, do not use this site. AllianceBernstein may at any time revise these terms of use. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then current terms of use to which you are bound. This site is for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security which may be referenced herein.

Terms Of Use

This site is solely intended for use by professional/institutional investors and institutional-investment industry consultants.

Do you wish to continue?

 

Can the US Economy Weather the Trade Wars?

July 17, 2018
3 min read
| Director—Developed Market Economic Research

Aluminum. Cars. Solar panels. It’s hard to track the tariffs without a scorecard. As headlines continue to swirl, many investors worry about the impact on the US economy. Clearly, tariffs and trade wars hurt growth, but we don’t think the impact will be big enough to derail the economy just yet.

Tariffs and trade tensions are a potential headwind for growth—both in the US and in other countries. However, the US economy is robust, and in our assessment, it can absorb the potential hit without too much disruption. Of course, with both announced and threatened tariffs coming and going by the day, the true impact is a fast-moving target.

From our perspective, assessing the potential growth impact means taking a closer look at the three channels through which trade measures can exert their influence on the economy:

  1. Direct Impact: Less than in Most Other Countries

    The good news for the US is that its economy isn’t particularly trade sensitive. In technical terms, the US is a relatively “closed” economy: Trade is a relatively small percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (Display). So, a 10% tariff on $200 billion of imported goods, for example, would reduce gross domestic product (GDP) growth by $20 billion—or about 0.1% of GDP.

    The US Is Less Vulnerable to Trade Wars than Other Economies

    Trade as a Perentage of Gross Domestic Product

    The US Is Less Vulnerable to Trade Wars than Other Economies

    As of December 31, 2017
    Source: World Bank

    The direct growth impact of the ongoing trade war will likely be larger in other countries. For one thing, their overall economies are significantly smaller than that of the US. And they’re more “open” than the US economy: Trade is a bigger share of their GDP. That makes them more exposed to the direct impact of tariffs and restrictions.

  2. Markets: Costlier Financing All Around

    The direct impact of trade tensions is likely to be quite small, but that’s not the only channel through which the trade-war impact will be felt. Each new round of announced tariffs and every round of rhetoric threatening tariffs has unnerved financial markets, pushing equities lower and the dollar higher.

    Both of those market responses will slow growth over time by raising the cost of financing for both businesses and consumers. The dollar has already appreciated by almost 6% over the last six months or so. That isn’t enough to derail economic growth, but it does dampen the prospects over time.

  3. Business Investment: The Confidence Factor

    Over time, the biggest impact will likely come from lower business confidence. Many US businesses, particularly manufacturers, rely on imported goods. Tariffs will make many of those goods pricier, hurting bottom lines and making investment and production in the US less attractive.

    Exporters will likely see less overseas demand because of reciprocal tariffs imposed by US trading partners. It’s too early to know for sure how big the impact will be—most of the announced tariffs only went into effect in early July or should start in the next couple of months.

    But there are early indications. The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s survey of companies’ capital-investment plans shows that investment plans have declined since trade tensions started to percolate a few months ago (Display). Essentially, the impact so far has offset much of the investment incentive from last year’s tax cuts. It doesn’t necessarily slow growth as much as prevent it from accelerating further.

    US Capital Spending Plans Have Taken a Hit This Year

    Capital Expenditures Intentions Index

    US Capital Spending Plans Have Taken a Hit This Year

    Through June 30, 2018
    Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Trade Friction Is a Negative—but Unlikely to Derail the US Economy

Because the US economy is relatively closed and financial markets have been resilient so far, we don’t think that trade tensions are likely to be significant enough to derail a very strong economy.

But trade frictions are clearly a negative for economic growth. With no sign that things will settle down anytime soon, trade policy remains a clear risk to our forward outlook. We don’t think it’s necessary to adjust our growth forecasts just yet, but like the rest of the world, we’re watching closely to see how the trade war plays out in the coming months.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.


About the Author

Eric Winograd is a Senior Vice President and Director of Developed Market Economic Research. He joined the firm in 2017. From 2010 to 2016, Winograd was the senior economist at MKP Capital Management, a US-based diversified alternatives manager. From 2008 to 2010, he was the senior macro strategist at HSBC North America. Earlier in his career, Winograd worked at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the World Bank. He holds a BA (cum laude) in Asian studies from Dartmouth College and an MA in international studies from the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies. Location: New York