Economics Low-Yield Environment Alternatives Equities Fixed Income Multi-Asset Blog

Investing in the Time of COVID-19…and Beyond

11 June 2021
3 min read
A gently curving pedestrian foot bridge is suspended over the shoreline.
Richard A. Brink, CFA| Market Strategist—Client Group
Walt Czaicki, CFA | Senior Investment Strategist—Equities
Brian Resnick, CFA| Director and Senior Investment Strategist—Fixed Income and Multi Asset

Against a backdrop of an economic reopening and abundant fiscal stimulus, investors can still wring some value out of the uncertainty premium surrounding the path back from COVID-19. But the dislocations won’t last for long, and at some point, investors will face a back-to-the-future scenario.

The same issues that existed before COVID-19 will remain (Display), only more acute because stimulus has pulled forward returns and racked up more debt. In this next chapter, which will start “the day after the virus,” investors will face lower returns and other possible side effects from secular trends—one of which could be longer-term structural inflation.

Capital-Market Tailwinds Have Been Fading
Charts showing a declining work-age population, peaking world trade, rising debt and falling bond yields

Past performance and current analysis do not guarantee future results. For illustrative purposes only.
Through November 30, 2020
Source:  Bloomberg, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Haver Analytics, US Department of Labor, US Department of the Treasury, World Trade Organization and AB

Low Returns and Ill-Timed Drawdowns: Threats to Income, Lifestyle and Legacy

What could capital-market returns look like going forward? Take a classic 60/40 stock/bond portfolio, for example (Display): Forecasts at the end of 2018 called for roughly 5.4% annualized returns over the next 10 years. By late 2020, that number had shrunk to 3.1%, with a more than 40% chance of investors experiencing a 20% peak-to-trough loss.

Investing After COVID-19—Low Returns Likely Ahead
Projected Median 10-Year Annualized Return for 60/40 Portfolio*
A chart showing total US nonfarm payroll employment over the past decade

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data do not represent past performance and are not a promise of actual future results or a range of future results.
There is no guarantee that any estimates or forecasts will be realized.
* Represents projected median compound annual growth rates over the next 10 years for a portfolio of 60% stocks/40% bonds. The globally diversified stock allocation comprises: 16.2% US value, 16.2% US growth, 12.0% US diversified, 6.0% US small-/mid-cap, 23.7% developed foreign markets, 7.3% emerging markets, 9.6% US low-volatility equity, 9.0% high-risk international. This allocation is scaled down to 60% of the 60/40 portfolio. Equity geography weights may shift. Bonds are represented by diversified intermediate-term municipal bonds in the proportions noted. Additional details regarding allocation are available upon request. 
As of December 31, 2020 
Source: AB

In this environment, an ill-timed market downturn—magnified by inefficient portfolio design that may create vulnerabilities—could lead to running out of money or simply create a yawning “means gap,” with plans for philanthropy, legacy and other life goals taking a major hit.

Better downside protection in the years directly before and after retirement is a key to engineering a successful retirement. Designed effectively, such a portfolio will likely exhibit a lower probability of enduring big drawdowns. But in long-term wealth building, upside matters too. That’s the conundrum investors face today—the need to participate and defend.

The Keys to Designing a Better Return Path

In our view, the solution is to build a portfolio that has better up/down capture: the percentage of rising markets it captures versus the percentage of falling markets it captures. Getting that balance right is the challenge for every investor—and requires three main elements:

Better beta. Some markets—and approaches—have persistently delivered better up/down capture—quality equities, for example. Over the past 10 years, the MSCI World Quality Index captured 99% of the MSCI World Index’s upside but only 80% of its downside. That’s an up/down capture ratio of 1.24 versus the MSCI World (which, as the reference benchmark, is by definition 1.0).

Efficient structure. Combining different betas can create structures that also result in a smoother return path. For example, over the past decade, a combination of two fixed-income betas—50% US Treasury bonds and 50% US high-yield bonds—has produced a 1.49 up/down capture ratio versus US corporate high-yield bonds alone. Of course, the selection of the components, their assembly and interactions, and their ability to adapt to dynamic markets all come into play in determining portfolio success.

Targeted alpha. Passive investing has its benefits, with many options to choose from and cheap beta exposure. But broadly indexing market segments may create structural and definitional issues. Outperformance from skilled active management, by contrast, can navigate risks and uncover opportunities—an ability magnified when targeting less efficient markets.

Each element—better beta, efficient structure and targeted alpha—can create a favorable return sequence and be even more powerful in combination. But to what end? In our experience, three goals—two classic and one newer—seem front and center on investors’ minds. Improving the path of returns should be done through the lens of stable-growth, efficient-income and purpose-driven investing goals.

Want to learn more about post-pandemic portfolio construction? Download a copy of AB’s white paper, A Guide to Investing in the Time of COVID-19…and Beyond.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations, and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams and are subject to change over time.

About the Authors

Richard A. Brink is a Senior Vice President and Market Strategist in the Client Group. Previously, he served as a managing director in the Alternatives and Multi-Asset Group. Prior to that role, Brink was a senior portfolio manager in Fixed Income, and before that an investment director for fixed-income investments within the Global Retail Investments Group. Before joining AB in 2004, he was senior product manager at the Dreyfus Corporation, covering both retail and institutional fixed-income offerings. Brink was previously a senior trainer, dealing primarily with the design and delivery of product training to financial advisors and mutual fund sales representatives. He holds a BS in applied mathematics and economics from Stony Brook University, and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York

Walt Czaicki serves as a Senior Vice President and Senior Investment Strategist for Equities at AB. He rejoined the firm in 2015 and has been in the investment-management industry since 1986. Czaicki's roles have ranged from a fundamental equity research analyst and portfolio manager to chief investment officer. Prior to rejoining AB, he worked on the buy side for a Regions Financial predecessor organization, as well as at Commerce Trust Company and Bank of America. Czaicki holds a BSBA in finance and an MBA, both from Saint Louis University. He is a CFA charterholder. Location: Dallas

Brian Resnick is Director and Senior Investment Strategist for Fixed Income and Multi Asset. Prior to joining AB, he was a vice president and account manager at PIMCO, where he worked closely with financial intermediaries serving the private wealth marketplace. Previously, Resnick was a director of institutional services at Lord Abbett, working with institutional investment consultants, foundations and sub-advised funds-of-funds. He has been an investment professional since 2004. Resnick holds a BS in economics from Carnegie Mellon University and an MS in financial engineering from Baruch College, and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York