Norway

Institutional Investor
Investment Professional
Individual Investor
The Norway website is not available. You will be redirected to the Luxembourg website which contains funds approved for marketing in Luxembourg, and where several of these funds are not registered for marketing in Norway.

Norges nettside er ikke tilgjengelig. Du vil bli omdirigert til Luxembourg-nettstedet som inneholder midler godkjent for markedsføring i Luxembourg, og hvor flere av disse fondene ikke er registrert for markedsføring i Norge.

EMD

A Survivor—Past, Present, Future

27 February 2018

3 min read

Christian DiClementi| Portfolio Manager—Emerging Market Debt

Following a strong 2017, emerging-market debt (EMD) held its own in January despite a sharp rise in US interest rates. That’s no accident. Economic fundamentals have improved dramatically, leaving EMD well positioned to withstand future turbulence.

US Treasury yields surged in January as investors belatedly began pricing in higher inflation and the possibility of as many as four interest-rate hikes this year from the Federal Reserve. Even so, many EMD indices for US dollar– and local currency¬–denominated bonds produced positive returns. Local-currency debt did especially well, even outpacing global high-yield corporates.

Active EMD managers produced even more impressive results; more than 75% of active hard-currency managers outperformed their benchmarks in January.

Neither the current volatility nor EMD’s recent performance should come as a surprise. We warned late last year that a reassessment of inflation and US interest-rate risk was overdue and that volatility would increase. We also urged investors to stay active and be selective about their EMD exposure. But we did not suggest pulling back on EMD, which we said was in a strong position to withstand increased volatility.

What explains the sector’s staying power? To answer that, let’s quickly review where EMD has been, where it is now and where we think it’s headed.

The Past. Over the past few years, many emerging economies have reduced their current account deficits, tamed inflation and started to shore up their public finances by instituting spending caps and simpler tax systems and ending energy and other subsidies.

It wasn’t always so. In the early part of the decade, many EM countries ran larger current account deficits and depended on portfolio inflows—money invested in domestic stock and bond markets—to finance them. When the Federal Reserve first hinted in 2013 at plans to tighten its easy monetary policy, global investors took that as their cue to cut risk, causing EM currency values to plunge and interest rates to rise.

The vast improvement in EM economic fundamentals has reduced the vulnerability of these countries to these types of sudden portfolio outflows. Today, foreign direct investment, a more stable source of funding than portfolio flows because it tends to be longer term, is strong enough to finance today’s smaller deficits.

The Present. Country, company and sector selection within EMD still matter, of course. That’s partly because political risk can’t be ignored. Several countries are facing important elections in 2018. The good news is that political risk varies greatly by country. The risks in Brazil or Russia are different from those in Mexico or Venezuela.

This is why it’s so important to embrace an active approach. The latest bout of market volatility indicates how valuable such an approach can be. According to Morningstar data, 80% of actively managed EMD strategies beat their benchmarks.* We’ve seen similar results over the longer haul. Between 2004 and 2017, 69% of active EMD managers beat the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global over three-year rolling periods.

The Future. Developed-market interest rates, led by those in the US, are likely to keep rising as the post-financial crisis era of easy money comes to an end. The Fed has signaled plans for several more rate hikes this year, and our economists expect the European Central Bank to end asset purchases in 2018 and start raising rates in 2019.

That should push up long-term Treasury and other bond yields. But as long as tighter policy and higher bond yields come with strong global growth, this shouldn’t be a problem for EM assets. Strong growth in the US and other advanced countries tends to boost economic activity elsewhere. And emerging markets’ strong economic fundamentals will add another layer of support for EMD.

What’s more, EMD has shown in recent years that it can withstand gradual rises in rates. Since 1993, there have been nine periods in which the 10-year US Treasury yield rose by at least 100 basis points. Hard-currency EMD produced positive cumulative returns in seven of them. Local-currency EMD has a shorter history, but has also held its own through most of the recent periods of rising yields.

EMD’s strong performance during this very volatile period suggests it should be a core holding in any fixed-income allocation. We think investors who take an active approach to EMD and are selective about their exposures give themselves a better chance of increasing their portfolio returns.
*Includes all constituent funds within the EAA Fund Global Emerging Markets Bond Morningstar Category vs. the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams.

About the Author

Christian DiClementi

Christian DiClementi is a Senior Vice President and Lead Emerging Market Debt Portfolio Manager at AB. He is also a member of the Global Fixed Income, Absolute Return and Income portfolio-management teams, and oversees emerging-market investments across AB’s suite of fixed-income products. DiClementi joined the firm in 2003. Prior to becoming a member of the Emerging Market Debt portfolio-management team in 2013, he served as a member of AB’s Economic Research Group, focusing mainly on sovereign fundamental research for the Caribbean, Central American and Latin American regions. Previously, DiClementi worked as an analyst in the firm’s Quantitative Research Group, with an emphasis on global sovereign return and risk modeling, and as an associate portfolio manager responsible for municipal bond portfolios. He holds a BS in mathematics (summa cum laude) from Fairfield University. Location: New York

This is a marketing communication. This information is provided by AllianceBernstein (Luxembourg) S.à r.l. Société à responsabilité limitée, R.C.S. Luxembourg B 34 305, 2-4, rue Eugène Ruppert, L-2453 Luxembourg. Authorised in Luxembourg and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an invitation to purchase any security or other investment. The views and opinions expressed are based on our internal forecasts and should not be relied upon as an indication of future market performance. The value of investments in any of the Funds can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This information is directed at Professional Clients only and is not intended for public use.

EMD

A Survivor—Past, Present, Future

More For You