Multi-Asset Investing in a Post-Peak Rate Climate

18 January 2024

2 min read

Sharat Kotikalpudi| Director of Quantitative Research—Multi-Asset Solutions

Rate cuts don’t happen in a vacuum—staying nimble with asset allocation can help investors adapt.

Although inflation continues to wane in most global economies, it could be some time before monetary policy easing starts in earnest. Still, interest rates have probably peaked—it’s now just a question of when rate cuts will start.

The economic backdrop for rate cuts matters too. Monetary policy easing can happen in two possible climates, recession or growth, and in recent decades those climates have prevailed with pretty much equal frequency—particularly in the US. For example, in the seven Federal Reserve easing cycles since 1990, four were linked to recessions and three to relatively healthy economies (Display 1).

With Rates Near Peak, Cuts Are Likely—but in What Economic Conditions?

Since 1990, four of seven easing cycles were during recession, and three weren’t, with different return results for assets.

Historical analysis does not guarantee future results.
Definition of recession periods based on the business cycle dating indicator from the National Bureau of Economic Research.
As of September 30, 2023
Source: Bloomberg, National Bureau of Economic Research and AllianceBernstein (AB)

What outcome will we see this time? For much of 2023, recession dominated expectations; recently, the view has shifted to slow growth for 2024. Consensus expectations don’t necessarily play out, but the underlying economic regime when rate cuts happen has made a big difference in performance patterns across asset types. We think multi-asset investors should be ready to adapt to either scenario.

More Asset Types Struggled During Recession-Era Rate Cuts

Our research shows that rate-cut periods leading up to recessions have been the most challenging, though some assets have done well. Based on Sharpe ratio, a common measure of risk-adjusted return, equities struggled in the six months before and after the first cut. Global government bonds, in contrast, have been effective, except for hiccups at six-months before and in the first month after cuts begin. Still, equities’ shortfall left a diversified 60/40 strategy underperforming (Display 2, top).

The Investment Impact of Rate Cuts May Depend on Economic Climate

Global bonds and trend exceled in recession-era cuts, while 60/40 portfolios and hedge funds did best without a recession.

Historical analysis does not guarantee future results.
Equity returns represented by MSCI World Index; bond returns by AB’s aggregation of developed-market sovereign bonds scaled to duration; 60/40 portfolio comprised of 60% equity and 40% bond; commodities represented by AB’s aggregation of individual commodities based on Bloomberg Commodity Index weights; hedge funds represented by the HFRI Composite Index; trend strategies represented by the Société Générale Cross Asset Trend Following Index. Rate cut periods used for this analysis occurred between 1990 to 2023.
As of September 30, 2023
Source: Bloomberg, Hedge Fund Research, MSCI, Société Générale and AB

When rate cuts occur in the absence of a recession—the current central case—they’ve provided stronger support for investment performance. Except for commodities, an easing cycle in a growing economy has historically pushed most asset classes higher for the 12-month period surrounding the first cut (Display 2, bottom).

Some diversifiers have also excelled more in certain environments—hedge funds and trend strategies, for example. Trend-following strategies have historically done better in recessionary climates, as they’re designed to help protect portfolios during downturns. Since hedge funds are the most uncorrelated to other assets, they typically do better during unstressed markets, which is why they’ve outperformed during rate-cut periods not associated with a recession. We believe that this behavior, and the low correlations among these and other alternative assets, has enabled them to enhance the risk/return of a diversified strategy.

Embracing the “Less Exceptional” with a Multi-Asset Approach

Extremes in inflation, interest rates and monetary policies created a roller-coaster ride for most asset types through 2023. Recent data show markets and economies continuing to normalize, and the investment climate has historically tended to improve relatively quickly once interest rates peak.

Bonds rallied recently as yields fell and prices rose, but we still see room to run. Investors, however, should be selective when adding duration exposure, given the lingering rate uncertainty. We also like the outlook for risk assets such as equities—markets soared in 2023 on the narrow coattails of seven stocks, but should benefit more broadly from falling inflation.

From a big-picture perspective, slow economic growth is widely expected in 2024, but it’s not a given. That means multi-asset investors need to stay nimble to respond to changing market conditions, which could still include higher-for-longer rates and a few surprises. Considering how assets behave differently in two distinct post-peak environments, we think active diversification offers the potential to enhance performance no matter which scenario unfolds.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

About the Author

Sharat Kotikalpudi

Sharat Kotikalpudi is the Director of Quantitative Research in the Multi-Asset Solutions Group at AB, specializing in systematic macro strategies; he leads the group's quantitative research in directional and cross-sectional strategies across developed and emerging markets within equity futures, currencies, rates and commodities. He is also a Portfolio Manager of AB Systematic Macro. Kotikalpudi joined AB in 2010 as a quantitative analyst on the Dynamic Asset Allocation team, where he helped to design and develop the quantitative toolset used in the group’s asset-allocation strategies. He holds a BE in electronics and communication engineering from the Manipal Institute of Technology, India, an MA in mathematics of finance from Columbia University and a PGDM from the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. Location: New York

This is a marketing communication. This information is provided by AllianceBernstein Limited, 60 London Wall, London, EC2M 5SJ. Registered in England, No. 2551144. AllianceBernstein Limited is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA - Reference Number 147956). It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an invitation to purchase any security or other investment. The views and opinions expressed are based on our internal forecasts and should not be relied upon as an indication of future market performance. The value of investments in any of the Funds can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This information is directed at Professional Clients only and is not intended for public use.

Multi-Asset Investing in a Post-Peak Rate Climate

More Asset Types Struggled During Recession-Era Rate Cuts

Embracing the “Less Exceptional” with a Multi-Asset Approach

More For You