What Is Stoking Uncertainty?
As the year began, investors faced a challenging outlook. Macroeconomic growth prospects looked solid, although a slower pace of growth than in 2021 was widely expected. Similarly, earnings growth was generally expected to continue at a more modest clip than last year, when economies and companies were recovering from the sharp pandemic-induced recession of 2020.
Monetary policy changes were in the cards. The US Federal Reserve had already signaled its intention to raise interest rates and to taper its quantitative easing program. In this environment, it isn’t surprising that growth stocks in general—and particularly hypergrowth stocks with very high valuations—would come under pressure. Rising rates tend to disproportionately compress valuations of growth stocks, whose cash flows are much further in the future than value stocks.
While we anticipated a year of uncertainty, the speed, intensity and breadth of the sell-off has been jarring. So, given that many of the variables for the outlook were known, why have stocks sold off so sharply?
Monetary Policy and Growth Fears
In our view, the uncertainty isn’t really about the number of rate hikes in store. Rather, given the complex macroeconomic landscape of high inflation and uncertain growth prospects, not least because of ongoing COVID-19 disruptions, investors are concerned that the Fed and other central banks may not succeed at the delicate policy balancing act. In other words, central bank missteps aimed at combating inflation could undermine GDP growth and tip economies into recession. Getting the policy formula right will determine whether we’re headed for a slowdown or healthy growth in 2023.
Company earnings hang in the balance. While the current volatility may be driven by macro and policy fears, long-term stock returns are driven primarily by earnings and cash flows. The volatile US trading session on Wednesday, January 26 illustrated this tension. Early in the day, stocks jumped, fueled by Microsoft’s results and forecasts, which beat consensus estimates. But stocks closed lower after the Fed’s statement suggested a hawkish turn in policy, with the potential for tighter policy moves if the inflation picture worsens.
This tug-of-war is creating a challenging environment for equity investors. But over the long term, we believe that stocks still offer compelling return potential. And over the short term, trying to time market inflection points is a risky strategy that rarely succeeds.
Quality Focus Is Vital
In current market conditions, we believe that focusing on high-quality stocks with strong fundamentals and reasonable valuations is essential. Stocks like these can help reduce risk when markets are falling, and are more likely to do well when a recovery materializes, in our view.
We think investors should avoid extremes in equity markets. Investors who loaded up on expensive hypergrowth stocks have already been burned by the current market repricing. But going to the opposite extreme of accepting lower-quality businesses in return for cheap valuations would also be a mistake, in our view. While “junk rallies” have sometimes happened in the past, they typically follow financial crises or deep recessions as the threat of widespread bankruptcy recedes—very different circumstances to today.
Quality stocks tend to perform relatively well during market crises and over longer time periods (Display). We believe that a quality discipline should be applied to all types of stocks—value and growth. In both camps, we look for solid companies in the middle with resilient balance sheets and quality businesses.