Inflation Volatility Equities Blog

Finding the Middle Path in Extreme Equity Markets

Feb 09, 2022
4 min read
An overhead view of a road cutting through the middle of an icy forest with snow-capped trees.
Kent Hargis, PhD| Chief Investment Officer—Strategic Core Equities; Portfolio Manager—Global Low Carbon Strategy
Sammy Suzuki, CFA| Head—Emerging Markets Equities

Equity markets were jolted in January amid growing concerns about macroeconomic threats. For investors seeking more stable equity allocations, stocks “in the middle,” with high-quality features and reasonable valuations, can help portfolios cope with volatility.

With inflation rising, fears that policymakers could tip economies into recession have eroded enthusiasm for stocks after three strong years. Hypergrowth names at the most expensive extreme of the US market were hit hardest. We believe these trends reinforce the need for defensive equity strategies to help reduce risk in a downturn and capture recovery potential.

In good times and bad, predicting macroeconomic and policy trends isn’t a prudent strategy for equity investors, in our view. Instead, investors can seek to build a macro-resilient portfolio by investing in companies with features that are likely to withstand the key risks to equity markets. Today, those risks are interest rates/inflation, valuation and a decelerating growth outlook.

Position for Heightened Inflation

Inflation and interest rates are the biggest source of uncertainty today. While the US Federal Reserve and Bank of England have signaled plans for aggressive rate hikes, the European Central Bank has taken a more moderate stance. Market volatility is being fueled by a tension between concerns about monetary policy and signs of solid corporate earnings.

In this environment, equity investors must distinguish between businesses that are more likely to do well in an inflationary environment and those more vulnerable to higher prices. Defensive portfolios should also aim to identify companies with fundamentals that are more likely to hold firm if efforts to combat inflation trigger a worse-than-expected economic slowdown.

High quality companies are always an important component of a lower volatility equity allocation, in our view. But given the inflation risks, pricing power is an especially important quality feature today. Companies with pricing power will find it easier to maintain margins as inflation rises. Those with significant intangible assets, such as proprietary data, R&D and human capital, are also likely to enjoy pricing power. Even in technology, a sector that isn’t usually seen as defensive, some companies have more pricing power today than in the past.

Quality alone isn’t enough. We believe quality companies with relatively stable stock prices and attractive valuations are the best way to reduce volatility in an equity portfolio. These characteristics tend to perform well in inflationary environments, too. Our research suggests that the most attractive quintile of US companies based on free cash flow to assets (quality), low beta (stability) and price to free cash flow (price) delivered an annualized return of 9.6% in inflationary environments (Display). That’s more than double the performance of this group of stocks in all environments, because high inflation has historically been followed by economic slowdowns and recession.

Stocks With Quality, Stability and Attractive Prices Have Done Well Amid High Inflation
Left chart shows the US consumer price index. Right chart shows the performance of stocks with quality, stability and attractive prices in high inflation environments and all environments.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.
As of December 31, 2021
Universe is the US Large cap universe. QSP represented by the most attractive quintile of US stocks based on free cash flow to assets (quality), low beta (stability) and price to free cash flow (price). High inflation environments are the top tercile in 12-month increase in the consumer price index (CPI).
Sources: Compustat, IDC and AllianceBernstein (AB)

Certain types of defensive equities, such as low-beta stocks, have underperformed in the past when interest rates rose. However, these risks can be managed by active investors who reduce exposure to sectors and companies that are more vulnerable to inflation and interest-rate risk.

Valuations and Volatility

Recent market volatility refocused attention on valuations. In 2021, rising valuations were driven primarily by strong earnings growth amid the rebound from the pandemic-induced collapse. With earnings growth forecast to fall back to more normal levels in 2022, concerns about valuations are understandable.

But valuations across sectors and within industries are diverse—particularly in defensive stocks. In consumer staples and health care, for example, equities are much cheaper than they’ve been in the last 10 years (Display).

Relative Valuations of Defensive Sectors Are Attractive
Bar chart shows historical percentiles of price/forward earnings forecasts for global equity sectors.

Past performance and historical analysis do not guarantee future results.
As of January 31, 2022
*Valuation percentiles for sectors are cap-weighted average price-to-next 12 months earnings forecast relative to benchmark and relative to their own history. Valuation percentiles calculated within Europe (including the UK), Japan, and the US separately, subsequently averaged using MSCI World aggregate market capitalization weights to arrive at the Developed Market numbers. The investable universe contains Russell 1000 stocks in the US and the MSCI World index constituents from Europe (including the UK) and Japan.
Source: FTSE Russell, I/B/E/S, MSCI, Refinitiv and AllianceBernstein (AB)

And in defensive industries, such as utilities and pharma, biotech and life sciences, share price gains last year were relatively modest when compared with earnings growth (Display). Multiples in these industries aren’t nearly as stretched as in other industries, so shares of companies with solid earnings growth potential are more likely to do well in a more volatile environment.

Price Versus Earnings Differential Highlights Opportunity in Defensives
Table shows change in price and earnings for defensive, value and growth industries from 2020 to 2021.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.
As of January 31, 2022
*Measures change in price and estimated 2021 earnings from January 2020 to January 2022
Source: Factset, MSCI and AllianceBernstein (AB)

Evaluating earnings potential must take into account today’s unusual business conditions. In industries like retail or technology hardware, exceptionally strong demand during the pandemic and subsequent supply chain constraints may have inflated earnings and margins, which could revert to more normal levels as economic growth slows. In contrast, in some key defensive sectors, such as consumer staples and communications services, we haven’t seen these types of earnings distortions, which can help support more stable earnings patterns.

High Quality for Heightened Uncertainty

To find these companies, investors should avoid the market extremes—very expensive hypergrowth companies or extremely cheap low-quality companies. Companies that we call quality compounders have successful business models and sustainable earnings, backed by good capital stewardship and positive ESG behavior. These attributes support compounding earnings gains from consistent growth drivers through market cycles.

The volatile start to 2022 should serve as a wake-up call for investors. Extraordinary circumstances created by the pandemic have left many risks for investors to navigate. And global growth is also challenged by risks that prevailed before the pandemic, from populism and elevated debt to heightened regulatory risk and geopolitical risks.

But heightened uncertainty doesn’t need to be a deterrent from equity exposure. Focusing on defensive stocks with the right features and attractive valuations can help investors stay the course in equities through unpredictable times ahead and position to capture recovery potential.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

About the Authors

Kent Hargis is the Chief Investment Officer of Strategic Core Equities. He created the Strategic Core platform and has been managing the Global, International and US Strategic Core portfolios since their inception in 2011. Hargis has also been Portfolio Manager for the Global Low Carbon Strategy Portfolio since 2022. Previously, he managed the Emerging Portfolio from 2015 through 2023. Hargis was global head of quantitative research for Equities from 2009 through 2014, with responsibility for directing research and the application of risk and return models across the firm’s equity portfolios. He joined AB in 2003 as a senior quantitative strategist. Prior to that, Hargis was chief portfolio strategist for global emerging markets at Goldman Sachs. From 1995 through 1998, he was assistant professor of international finance in the graduate program at the University of South Carolina, where he published extensively on various international investment topics. Hargis holds a PhD in economics from the University of Illinois, where his research focused on international finance, econometrics and emerging financial markets. Location: New York

Sammy Suzuki is Head of Emerging Markets Equities, responsible for overseeing AB’s emerging-markets equity business and instrumental in the formation and shaping of AB’s Emerging Markets Equity platform. He was also a key architect of the Strategic Core platform and has managed the Emerging Markets Portfolio since its inception in 2012, and the Global, International and US portfolios from 2015 to 2023. Suzuki has managed portfolios since 2004. From 2010 to 2012, he also held the role of director of Fundamental Value Research, where he managed 50 fundamental analysts globally. Prior to managing portfolios, Suzuki spent a decade as a research analyst. He joined AB in 1994 as a research associate, first covering the capital equipment industry, followed by the technology and global automotive industries. Before joining the firm, Suzuki was a consultant at Bain & Company. He holds both a BSE (magna cum laude)  in materials engineering from the School of Engineering and Applied Science, and a BS (magna cum laude) in finance from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Suzuki is a CFA charterholder and was previously a member of the Board of the CFA Society New York. He currently serves on the Board of the Association of Asian American Investment Managers. Location: New York