Equities Blog

The Phantom Metric

What Really Drives US Equity Valuations?

09 December 2019

4 min read

Vincent Dupont, CFA| Director of Research—US Growth Equities

Investors continue to question whether US equity valuations are too high, particularly for growth companies and versus other global markets. But standard valuation metrics don’t tell the whole story. Understanding the cost of capital can provide essential insight on valuing stocks.

US stocks have surged this year. The S&P 500 Index advanced by 28% through November 30 and is trading at a price/forward earnings ratio of nearly 18×, about 24% higher than its 15-year average. Yet standard P/E metrics are narrow indicators that don’t capture the macroeconomic or market context of valuation. To do that, investors need to go back to basics and look at what really drives the value of securities.

Expected Return: The Ultimate Measure of Value

What is the expected return of an investment? This is perhaps the most important question that investors ask when buying any security. By assuming the risk of an investment, we want to know what we’re likely to get back. A security’s expected return is a function of its price movements, which adjust constantly until buyers and sellers are in balance.

For some investments, the expected return is easy to observe. For example, if you lend $100 to your friend for an agreed 6% interest rate, you’ll be getting a return of $6. With corporate and government bonds, the electronically quoted yield is what you can expect to earn by holding the bond to maturity.

Stocks provide no such clarity. That’s because there’s no direct way to observe a stock’s expected return. But the “Cost of Capital” (COC) can help. It measures the rate of return that a company must earn on its investments to be profitable. As such, the COC is a good measure for the expected return of each stock—and the market.

The Risk-Free Rate

To interpret the COC, start with the so-called risk-free rate (RFR). The RFR is the near certain reward—or cost, if rates are negative—that you can expect from holding onto your cash instead of bearing the risks of investment. By buying a stock or bond, an investor decides to forgo the RFR. What determines the RFR is a hotly debated subject among economists. However, a good proxy for the RFR is the yield on the 10-year Treasury Inflation Protected Security (TIPS), a bond issued by the Federal Government that guarantees an after-inflation return. That yield is just above zero today.

Since stocks are riskier than the TIPS, the COC should always exceed the RFR. This spread between them is the so-called risk premium (Display). So, if the COC is 7% and the RFR 2%, then the risk premium is 5 percentage points.

Cost of Capital Can Help Measure the Expected Return of Stocks

Historical and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
Based on quarterly data
Through November 19, 2019

What does this spread have to do with valuations? As the stock market rises while expectations about future earnings remain unchanged, it becomes more expensive. Since investors will get less return for every dollar put into the market, the market’s expected return—the COC—has declined.

On the other hand, if the RFR and the COC fall by exactly the same amount, the risk premium remains unchanged. This means that the stock market’s valuation relative to other financial assets hasn’t really changed.

What Does the Risk Premium Signal?

The risk premium is a good gauge of market sentiment. In times of fear, the risk premium widens as investors shun risky corporate income in favor of safe government bonds, pushing down yields. That said, the COC and the TIPS yield typically move together, meaning the risk premium tends to fluctuate at around a constant value of about 5.5%, according to our estimates (Display).

Risk Premium is a Good Gauge of Investor Sentiment

Historical and current analyses do not guarantee future results.
Based on quarterly data
Through November 19, 2019
Source: FactSheet and AllianceBernstein (AB)

By mid-2018, the risk premium became unusually low. It expanded again as the stock market fell later that year. From early 2019 until recently, the risk premium remained fairly constant, even though the stock market rose sharply. That means the market became more expensive in absolute terms, but not in relative terms, for most of this year.

Expensive? Yes and No

Valuation questions can be a red herring for investors. In our view, even if the market is expensive on traditional metrics, as it is today, the real question is whether the risk premium is unusually high or low. In other words, are risk appetites so extreme that we can expect them to revert to a more normal level?

We don’t think so for now. The risk premium is currently at about 4.6%, slightly lower than its 15-year average. However, if the stock market keeps rising, driving the COC lower, and the TIPs yield stays constant or even rises, then the risk premium will shrink. And it could fall to an extremely low level before long.

So, is the US stock market expensive? Our answer: yes, in absolute terms (based on both the absolute value of the COC and common metrics such as P/E), but only somewhat in relative terms. However, since the risk premium isn’t extremely high or extremely low, we don’t think it is signaling a sharp potential reversal or downturn.

Timing market inflection points is almost never a good idea, in our view. Instead, we think it’s more useful to take the current estimated COC of 5.5% as a rough guide to what you can expect from investing in the market in current conditions. Yet even in a world of relatively modest returns, investors who focus on companies with sturdy business models, healthy balance sheets and the ability to earn economic returns in excess of their COC should be able to generate stronger equity return potential than the market over time.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams. Views are subject to revision over time.

About the Authors

Vincent Dupont, CFA

Vincent Dupont is a Senior Vice President and Director of Research for US Growth Equities. Before joining the US Growth team in 2009 as a portfolio manager, he spent 10 years as a fundamental research analyst covering semiconductors and semiconductor capital equipment. Prior to joining the firm in 1999, Dupont researched the Russian economy at the Council on Foreign Relations for a year and worked at the US State Department as an arms control official for six years. He holds a BA in political science from Northwestern University and a PhD in international affairs/Russian studies from Columbia University, and is a CFA charterholder. Location: New York

This website is authorized for use only by registered broker-dealers and is not authorized for use by the general public. The material contained herein is not for inspection by, distribution or quotation to, the general public. The sale of shares of AllianceBernstein funds may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. In particular, shares may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in the United States or to US persons, as is more fully described in the prospectus with respect to each fund. Shares of AllianceBernstein funds are offered only pursuant to the fund's current prospectus together with the most recent financial statements. The information on this page is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer to sell, or solicitation to buy, or a recommendation for the securities of any AllianceBernstein fund.

AllianceBernstein provides its investment management services in Canada through its affiliates Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC and AllianceBernstein Canada, Inc. Shares of the AllianceBernstein Luxembourg funds described herein are not registered in Canada for public sale to Canadian resident investors.